Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Policy document formatting (was: Internet Number Resources Review Proposal (diff?))

Daniel Shaw danielshaw at
Thu Dec 13 19:02:42 UTC 2018

I branched the thread. It's a different topic and nothing to do with the Resource Review Policy.

What I am saying is that having some way to easily understand changes made to *any* policy (in the future) makes is easier for all those in the community with an interest to understand the evolution process, separate from their opinion of the policy or its evolution.

Simply that less effort to follow any policy's evolution is one more small thing that helps drive and encourage wider participation. So on that note, any formatting that is preferred cannot be mandatory, as that would be non-inclusive. *Any* format must be acceptable. However I'd love to see: a) guidelines and best practices for *preferred* format(s). And: b) a process whereby the PDWG chairs (or a separate volunteer editor position, or staff) converts or re-formats such that changes after the initial submission are "diff-able".

- Daniel

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 13, 2018 10:17 AM, ALI Hadji Mmadi <alihadji90 at> wrote:

> Daniel,
> ...Du moment que l’objectif affiché, par certains, consiste à ne pas comprendre, le changement de format n’aidera à rien tant que l’esprit reste le même.
> Opposer pour opposer ...
> Bien cordialement.
> --Hadji
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list