Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Internet Number Resources Review Proposal
amelnaud at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 15:53:30 UTC 2018
Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 15:30, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> a écrit :
> > Op 11 dec. 2018, om 16:15 heeft Chevalier du Borg <
> virtual.borg at gmail.com> het volgende geschreven:
> >> Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 12:55, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> a
> écrit :
> >> To our knowledge there is no open issue.
> > Sorry, you are not credible person for this information. It is better
> for AFRINIC policy staff to list the issue.
> I think AFRINIC staff also shouldn't be the ones publishing this. It is
> the task of the working group chair(s) to evaluate consensus and whether
> arguments have been properly addressed. Now, if the chair(s) decide to ask
> the help of AFRINIC staff that is fine, but it should be the chair(s) who
> post the analysis to the list, and the chair(s) who have the responsibility
> for its accuracy and impartiality.
if you correctly read my message it is what I asked.
> IMHO such a summary should be part of any decision of the chairs, so that
> the community can see their reasoning. It will also help when there are
> disagreements as there will be something specific to discuss. It is a lot
> of work for the chairs, but be honest: without such an analysis how can
> they make a decision for/against consensus in the first place?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD