Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Opposing the last call made on the review policy

Chevalier du Borg virtual.borg at
Mon Dec 3 15:36:16 UTC 2018

Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 18:56, Sander Steffann <sander at> a écrit :

> Hi,
> > Dear AFRINIC policy staff
> >
> > Can you please put a document for this proposal that show objection and
> response like below?
> >
> > Objection no. 1
> >
> >      - author responses
> >      - author responses
> >      - author responses
> > [...]
> > I think it will help us know exactly which objection have been addressed
> or not.
> I think this is a great idea. However, considering that the working group
> chairs must have already done something similar in order to reach a
> conclusion when determining consensus, I think it would be easier to ask
> them to share their notes on this. I also think the chairs can be seen as
> more neutral compared to staff, and they are elected by this community for
> that.

I dont want easy.
I want detail, methodical and thorough from someone

i) who is pay to do this as their job
ii) who is not co-chair since people are already question their decision.

And I will like to see this for all proposal in future.

> So, as an outsider in this matter, I would suggest to this working group
> to ask the chairs to share their work, and possibly include such analysis
> by default in future announcements of (non-)consensus so it is visible to
> the working group what decisions are based on. It may avoid
> misunderstandings in the future. To the members of this working group: feel
> free to do with this message however you please. I'm just trying to show
> solutions for the procedural side, I don't have any stake or interest in
> this policy one way or the other.
> Cheers,
> Sander

Borg le Chevalier
"Common sense is what tells us the world is flat"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list