Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Opposing the last call made on the review policy

Willy MANGA mangawilly at
Sat Dec 1 16:11:51 UTC 2018

Hello Andrew,

Le 01/12/2018 à 07:16, Andrew Alston a écrit :
> You know,
> [...]
>   1.  Lack of legacy support in a fair ton of hardware – how do we deal with it
>   2.  Vastly inconsistent support for transition mechanisms and chronically bad support for most of these transition mechanisms in CPE’s
>   3.  The complete *mess* that MPLS support as concerns IPv6 (to this day you cannot do vpnv6 without a v4 underlay, martini is entirely bound to LDP and LDPv6 support is near non-existent, and I’ve yet to see Kompella working entirely without v4 in some form either)
>   4.  The security challenges around IPv6 and the bad implementations that create issues here – issues which over the years we have learnt to deal with in IPv4 – Happy to expound on these off list – and no – they have nothing to do with NAT or the lack thereof – because NAT as a security mechanism was the biggest lie ever sold to an industry.

If you agree, I suggest this part to be discussed within afripv6-discuss
list. There's already some suggestions [1]


Willy Manga

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list