[rpd] Inter-RIR Resource

[ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE]

I kind off agree with Daniel Yakmut. This might be the way to force IPV6
into the Africa. Some part of me is also feels it has to be done carefully.
Thanks


*Dr. Abdulkarim A.Oloyede*. *B. Eng (BUK), M.Sc (York), PhD (York), R.Eng,
A+*
*Senior Lecturer, **Department of Telecommunications Science, University of
Ilorin, Nigeria*
*Vice Chairman, Telecommunications  Development Advisory Group (TDAG),
**International
Telecommunication Union (ITU).*
*Alternative Emails: olouss at yahoo.com <olouss at yahoo.com>  OR
 aao500 at york.ac.uk <aao500 at york.ac.uk>*


On Tue, 27 Nov 2018, 10:08 Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net wrote:

> The support for Inter-RIR Resource Transfer could also be seen in the
> light  that it could also motivate and possibly be a catalyst for rapid
> deployment for IPv6. I want to argue that the thought that there are still
> a small pool of IPv4 available, makes users in the AfriNIC region slower in
> considering the option of deployment of IPv6. Therefore I will support a
> fast way of exhaustion, which also can be achieved through Inter-RIR
> transfer.
>
> By the way we have argued that IP is a global resource that we can share
> globally. Similarly, in some instances the entities that seek this transfer
> could be deploying infrastructure that is beneficial to the AfriNIC
> region.  In the business context, keeping IPs and waiting for slow uptake,
> can not be financially beneficial. So a transfer to an entity that needs it
> urgently will be provide the immediate finances, which I believe we need in
> the AfriNIC region.
>
> So my point here is that we should support the Inter-RIR Resource transfer.
>
> On Nov 25, 2018, at 3:41 PM, Taiwo Oyewande <taiwo.oyewande88 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Inter-RIR Resource Transfers as stated in the policy
> AFPUB-2018-GEN-003-DRAFT01 is an applauded development and I think will
> help promote business within LIRs and also help in the speedy deployment
> and acceptance of IPV6 in Africa. Afrinic has commenced Exhaustion phase 1,
> but is still an IPV4 haven compared to other RIRs based on the Internet
> number resource status report prepared by the RIRs
> https://ripe77.ripe.net/presentations/145-18-0903-NRO-Statistics-2018.pdf
> . This is bad for development as most RIRs are now more focused on IPV6
> deployment. Some RIRs have exhausted their IPV4 blocks and require IP
> blocks from neighboring RIRs. With this policy well implemented, Afrinic
> and LIRs will make substantial profit while Afrinic forces the needful
> development to the new internet, which is the IPV6.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>

-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20181127/e53ca919/attachment.html>