Search RPD Archives
[rpd] New proposal: Abuse Contact Policy Update
John Ngwoke
john.ngwoke at unn.edu.ng
Tue Nov 27 08:11:52 UTC 2018
I support the idea of using one attribute "abuse-c". I also support the
idea mandatory.
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:11 PM <herve.clement at orange.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I support the idea of making this information mandatory and verified.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Hervé CLEMENT
>
>
>
> *De :* JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD [mailto:rpd at afrinic.net]
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 10 octobre 2018 21:53
> *À :* Amreesh Phokeer
> *Cc :* rpd at afrinic.net
> *Objet :* Re: [rpd] New proposal: Abuse Contact Policy Update
>
>
>
> Is only one attribute, but keeping two names.
>
>
>
> I’m also on the same thinking, that just abuse-c is better, but there is
> no harm. Calling it with two names (if the people only need to update one),
> works well for tools that are relying in the older one (but is true that
> very few folks use it in this region …).
>
>
>
> Keeping both, may be a temporary measure until people update the new one
> (and the old data is transferred automatically, of course).
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De: *Amreesh Phokeer <amreesh.phokeer at gmail.com>
> *Fecha: *miércoles, 10 de octubre de 2018, 21:48
> *Para: *Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
> *CC: *<rpd at afrinic.net>
> *Asunto: *Re: [rpd] New proposal: Abuse Contact Policy Update
>
>
>
> Hi Jordi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:30 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <
> jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
>
> In fact, we can keep both, the IRT object and the abuse-c and make the
> whois in such way that respond with the same data to queries for IRT or
> abuse-c.
>
>
>
> IMO, having only 1 attribute (abuse-c or mnt-irt) should suffice, having
> both of them might add confusion.
>
>
>
> It could help to have a special WHOIS flag / option to extract the
> referred IRT/Abuse-c object directly from the inet(6)num/aut-num:
>
>
>
> something like:
>
> whois -h <host> --abuse <inetnum>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Amreesh
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.consulintel.es
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
--
[image: University Of Nigeria Nsukka]
John Ngwoke
*ICT <http://ict.unn.edu.ng/> *
*University of Nigeria Nsukka <http://unn.edu.ng/>Network Section
<http://ict.unn.edu.ng/sections/networking/>*
Mobile: +2348035723901 <http://ict.unn.edu.ng/key-officers/>
Skype: john.ngwok <http://ict.unn.edu.ng/key-officers/>e
website: www.unn.edu.ng
*Confidential Notice: *
"The contents of this e-mail including any attachment are confidential and
intended solely for the person(s) to whom they are addressed.
Any reader of this email who is not the intended recipient is notified that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete all copies from your computer
system. Subsequent alterations to this email after its transmission will be
disregarded."
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20181127/7d10424b/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list