Search RPD Archives
[rpd] New proposal: Abuse Contact Policy Update
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Oct 10 19:53:03 UTC 2018
Is only one attribute, but keeping two names.
I’m also on the same thinking, that just abuse-c is better, but there is no harm. Calling it with two names (if the people only need to update one), works well for tools that are relying in the older one (but is true that very few folks use it in this region …).
Keeping both, may be a temporary measure until people update the new one (and the old data is transferred automatically, of course).
De: Amreesh Phokeer <amreesh.phokeer at gmail.com>
Fecha: miércoles, 10 de octubre de 2018, 21:48
Para: Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [rpd] New proposal: Abuse Contact Policy Update
On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 11:30 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es> wrote:
In fact, we can keep both, the IRT object and the abuse-c and make the whois in such way that respond with the same data to queries for IRT or abuse-c.
IMO, having only 1 attribute (abuse-c or mnt-irt) should suffice, having both of them might add confusion.
It could help to have a special WHOIS flag / option to extract the referred IRT/Abuse-c object directly from the inet(6)num/aut-num:
whois -h <host> --abuse <inetnum>
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD