Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

Sander Steffann sander at
Thu Aug 16 23:33:48 UTC 2018

Hi Jordi,

> I think this will cover very well all the cases:
> "Providing addressing space to third party devices, including addresses for point-to-point links, and/or non-permanently providing addressing space to third parties, while they are used on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder, shall not be considered a sub-assignment.
> The provision of addressing space for permanent or semi-permanent connectivity, such as broadband services, is still considered a sub-assignment."

Yes, I think that is flexible enough to cover the cases.

> Also, in the proposal summary, I will add this text:
> "One more case is when an end-user contracts a third-party to do some services in their own network and they need to deploy their own devices, even servers, network equipment, etc. For example, security surveillance services may require that the contractor provides their own cameras, recording system, even their own firewall and/or router for a dedicated VPN, etc. Of course, in many cases, this surveillance system may need to use the addressing space of the end-user."
> Thoughts ?


More information about the RPD mailing list