[rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

When we had this discussion at ARIN it looks like for a native English speaker was more on the other way (regarding temporary or non-permanently), if that's what you mean.

But anyway, even shorter:

"Temporarily provisioning address space to a third-party device, for use on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addresses for (semi-)permanent connectivity, such as broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links."

1) Here it is clear that is temporary and broadband is excluded
2) Is clear that the device is from a third party
3) Is open to a single or a set of addresses
4) your "and temporarily provided address space to third parties" I think is a duplication of the first part, or I fail to see something. The space is provided to a "third party device", "not" to a third party. If we accept a generic "third party" it allows circumventing it for use in "many devices" (a network)
5) I avoid "like ISP" because it disallows the hot-space case (in my opinion)

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
Fecha: miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2018, 12:18
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

    Hi Jordi,
    
    > Mmm ... maybe even simpler:
    > 
    > "Non-permanently provisioning an address or prefix to a third party device, for use on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addresses for (semi-)permanent connectivity like ISP and broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links."
    
    No, that limits it to non-permanent again. You are undoing exactly what I added... You are making it even more restrictive, not even allowing the VM use-case you mentioned in your previous email.
    
    Sander
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.