[rpd] Objections should not require amendments

[aleruchi chuku]

If my objection to a proposed policy is simply that the existing one is not flawed, what form of amendment would you expect me to make? 
If I object to a specific issue on a policy or proposal and i have a better one, then of course it is alright to offer an alternative. Where I do not have an alternative but can clearly outline the problem of the proposed one, then it is alright too. We are supposed to be working for a better afrinic

Making a blanket statement that if one raises an objection then they must provide an amendment is not helpful.

Aleruchi


 

    On Wednesday, May 9, 2018, 5:21:26 PM GMT+1, 1mgirlieadezpet at gmail.com <1mgirlieadezpet at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 I think that those who object to certain proposals should be allowed to give justifiable reasons for objecting. They MAY suggest a "better way" of rephrasing the policy.
This makes the process "FAIR and OPEN"
Oluwaseun.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 
 
  On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 4:58 PM, Kangamutima zabika Christophe<funga.roho at yandex.com> wrote:   Mieux vaut éviter la généralisation, dans certains cas on a pas besoin de refaire toute la mouture, on a qu'à adjoindre des amendements valables. Ce qui n'est pas souhaitable c'est le blocage total de la machine. Spécialité préférées de certains contestataires des propositions des politiques

Kangamutima Zabika

_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
  
_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180509/64c39c73/attachment-0001.html>