[rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing BIS

[ALAIN AINA]

Hi 

> On 27 Apr 2018, at 09:37, aleruchi chuku <aleruchichuku at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Members,
> I am of the opinion that the original Soft Landing Policy be maintained. 

Ack.

> First, it aligns with the soft landing policy of other regions which is in continuous use.

While the idea of  soft landing following the global soft landing policy on the IANA v4 pool was accepted in most regions,each region adopted its own mechanisms for distributing ressources from the last /8

https://www.nro.net/rir-comparative-policy-overview-2017-04/#2-6

> Secondly the waiting period of 24months (5.4.6. Allowable limits) is detrimental to the growth of the internet and affect growth of member communities.


Noted.  This has been debated. The  revision list  and the list archives can tell how it went.


> Thirdly, a review of this policy will at the long run, work against the deployment of IPV6


Can you elaborate this point a little bit more ?


Thanks  for your contribution

—Alain
> 
> Aleruchi
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180428/0dc18155/attachment.html>