Search RPD Archives
[rpd] IPv6 Initial Allocation Update - Policy Proposal
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Sat Apr 28 06:52:02 UTC 2018
I’m not changing the time limit from the actual policy.
My perspective on this, which is the same we have in RIPE, LACNIC and APNIC, is that if you have a plan for 4 years you do your justification based in that plan. If you have a plan for 8 years, you do it based on that, and so on.
Regarding the maximum, there is no maximum in any RIR. Why you need to define a maximum if it is based in a realistic justification? If somebody needs a /19 (there are several cases that justified that or close to that), why setting up a limit and avoiding that organization to obtain the size they need?
De: Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com>
Fecha: sábado, 28 de abril de 2018, 0:39
Para: <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: [rpd] IPv6 Initial Allocation Update - Policy Proposal
In section 18.104.22.168 initial allocation size organizations may qualify for an initial allocation size larger than /32 by submitting documentation that justifies the request. Is there any time limit or turnaround time for satisfying this request supposing all documentation is considered to be okay?. Secondly what is the maximum size larger than a /32 that can be requested? _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD