[rpd] RPD : Prolicy proposal "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC" informations update

Tue Apr 10 09:53:55 UTC 2018

Hi Arnaud,

> On 10 Apr 2018, at 11:24, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Ernest for your prompt reaction, and I think now you read all content, in order to avoid the same mistake as last session ?

:-) Yes

> 
> Yes I can confirm that is the only change between v5 to v6

OK, let’s publish it and send to list.

regards,
Ernest.

> Regards
> 
> Arnaud
> 
> 2018-04-10 8:21 GMT+00:00 Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>:
> Hi Arnaud
> 
> Thanks for the updated proposal.
> 
> You have indicated as follows:
> 
> > 06 Apr. 2018
> >
> > Version 6.0
> > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > - Removing categorization between membership in random class section 13.3.1
> 
> Is 13.3.1 the only change from v5 to v6? Just making sure.
> 
> Regards
> Ernest
> 
> 
> > On 10 Apr 2018, at 11:06, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You're right Big Ernest, so find bellow the sixth version of our policy proposal for discussing on the list. Thanks
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Begin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >     Name : Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC (Draft 6)
> >     Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> >     Status: Under Discussion
> >     Date: 6 April 2018
> >
> > Authors:
> >         (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg> | AUF/TogoRER
> >         (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<jean.millogo at orange.com>| Orange Burkina
> >         (c) Marcus ADOMEY  <madomey at ug.edu.gh>  | University of Ghana
> >
> > 1.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by this Policy Proposal
> >
> > As Internet Number resources are finite, their allocation is based on the operational needs of end-users and Internet Services Providers, while avoiding stockpiling in accordance with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation Policy CPM 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment policy CPM 6.5 and Policy for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management in the AFRINIC region CPM 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service Agreement (RSA) provides the framework for investigations of the usage of allocated Internet Number resources, defines members’ obligation to cooperate and the measures to be taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to comply. The lack of such investigation or regular control can lead to inefficient usage of the Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and other type of abuses.
> >
> > 2.0 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses the Problem
> >
> > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC shall conduct regular reviews of resource utilization held by its members. This would allow recovery of any type of resource, where usage is not in compliance with the RSA. Those resources can be reallocated for better usage.
> >
> > 3.0 Proposal
> >
> > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as follows:
> >
> > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
> >
> > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
> >
> > Regular reviews of resource utilization are conducted by AFRINIC to ensure efficient and appropriate usage of resources. This allows for recovery of any type of resource where usage is not in compliance with the RSA; to allow such resources to be reallocated for better usage.
> >
> > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance with the terms outlined in the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
> >
> > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned resources, but priority goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
> >
> > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed shall be selected according to the following classes:
> >
> > 13.3.1 Random
> >
> > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random between the membership.
> >
> >
> > 13.3.2 Selected
> >
> >  Member is selected because of an internal report or due to a lack of contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
> >
> > 13.3.3 Reported: Here, members are reviewed either because:
> >
> > A) They have requested the review themselves or
> >
> > B) There has been a community complaint made against them that warrants investigation. Complaints shall be backed by evidence and AFRINIC staff shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to conduct the review. However this review is not applicable to a member  with the same resources portfolio on which a full review has been completed in the preceding 24 months.
> >
> >  AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion, after having assessed the nature of the evidence found in the community complaint, require that such evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a sworn affidavit or (ii) declared to be true before a Commissioner of Oath.
> >
> > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence has been established in accordance with:
> >
> > •    Breach of AFRINIC policies
> > •    Breach of the provisions of the registration service agreement or other legal agreements between the organization holding the resource and AFRINIC.
> >
> > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery process.
> >
> > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the organization and correct any discrepancy towards the RSA.
> >
> > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the member did not transfer the ressources to meet other AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted policies
> >
> >  AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be recovered for a period of three (3) months; during which the organization may at any time, seek compliance or transfer the ressources to other members
> >
> >  After this period, the resource shall be recovered and therefore the records of the previous holder of the recovered resource shall be updated in AFRINIC’s databases.
> >
> > C)  Any Internet Number Resources recovered under this policy may be assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and Assignment Policies.
> >
> > 13.5 Appeal procedure
> >
> > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the right to appeal against the result within the four weeks. Appeals shall follow an arbitration process as provided for in the
> > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil Procedure) of the Republic of Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an aggrieved party, suggest a pool of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable volunteers from the community.
> >
> > 13.6 Compliance Report
> >
> > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful report describing review activities, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
> >
> > 13.7 Acknowledgements
> >
> > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC Chair), Mr Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member)  and Mr Alain P. Aina for their  contributions  in the development of this Policy proposal.
> >
> > The authors also thank the community for the discussions and contributions.
> >
> > 4.0 Revision History
> > Date
> > Details
> > 18 May 2016
> >   Version 1.0
> > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
> > - Posted on RPD list
> > 05 Aug 2016
> >   Version 2.0
> > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
> > - Change on the policy’s name
> > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
> > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
> > 18 Nov 2016
> > Version 3.0
> > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
> > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on mailing list
> > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to thank the community for discussions and contributions
> > 11 Apr 2017
> > Version 4.0
> > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
> >
> > 21 Oct. 2107
> > Version 5.0
> > - Fiveth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
> > - Adding the paragraphe C to 13.3.3. according to the legal counsel proposition
> > - Rephrasing the paragraphe 13.5 to comply with staff and legal assessment
> > - Rephrasing the paragraphe 13.6 to comply with staff assessment and avoid any ambiguity
> > - Changing the co-authors list
> > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
> > - Amending 13.4 (B) to  reflect the Transfer policies
> >
> > 06 Apr. 2018
> >
> > Version 6.0
> > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > - Removing categorization between membership in random class section 13.3.1
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- End ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-03 7:50 GMT+00:00 Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>:
> > Hi Arnaud,
> >
> >> On 31 Mar 2018, at 18:41, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear PDWG,
> >> As you can see through the Lagos PPM minutes [1],  all  pending legal concerns  have been addressed. Last suggestion  received abiut removing categories in section 13.3.1( make the random selection applies to all members)  was  accepted by working group and  will reflect  in the next version  to come.
> >>
> >> While awaiting the new version, please send any new comments, suggestions you may have on the proposal [2]
> >>
> >> [1] https://afrinic.net/fr/library/policies/archive/ppm-minutes/2261-afrinic-27-pdwg-meeting-minutes
> >> [2] https://afrinic.net/fr/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2231-internet-number-resources-review-by-afrinic
> >
> > Please send the new version well ahead of the recommended CPM 3.4.2 deadline to allow reasonable time for staff's assessment of the updated proposal.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ernest.
> >
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180410/1c1d4367/attachment.sig>