[rpd] RPD : Prolicy proposal "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC" informations update

Tue Apr 10 08:24:30 UTC 2018

Thanks Ernest for your prompt reaction, and I think now you read all
content, in order to avoid the same mistake as last session ?

Yes I can confirm that is the only change between v5 to v6

Regards

Arnaud

2018-04-10 8:21 GMT+00:00 Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>:

> Hi Arnaud
>
> Thanks for the updated proposal.
>
> You have indicated as follows:
>
> > 06 Apr. 2018
> >
> > Version 6.0
> > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > - Removing categorization between membership in random class section
> 13.3.1
>
> Is 13.3.1 the only change from v5 to v6? Just making sure.
>
> Regards
> Ernest
>
>
> > On 10 Apr 2018, at 11:06, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > You're right Big Ernest, so find bellow the sixth version of our policy
> proposal for discussing on the list. Thanks
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Arnaud
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Begin ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------
> >
> >     Name : Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC (Draft 6)
> >     Ref. Name: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> >     Status: Under Discussion
> >     Date: 6 April 2018
> >
> > Authors:
> >         (a) Amelina A. A. Arnaud | <arnaud.amelina at togorer.tg> |
> AUF/TogoRER
> >         (b) Jean-Baptiste Millogo |<jean.millogo at orange.com>| Orange
> Burkina
> >         (c) Marcus ADOMEY  <madomey at ug.edu.gh>  | University of Ghana
> >
> > 1.0 Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by this Policy Proposal
> >
> > As Internet Number resources are finite, their allocation is based on
> the operational needs of end-users and Internet Services Providers, while
> avoiding stockpiling in accordance with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation Policy CPM
> 5.5, IPv6 Allocation and assignment policy CPM 6.5 and Policy for
> Autonomous System Numbers (ASN) Management in the AFRINIC region CPM
> 7.0.Section 4 of the Registration Service Agreement (RSA) provides the
> framework for investigations of the usage of allocated Internet Number
> resources, defines members’ obligation to cooperate and the measures to be
> taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to comply. The lack of such
> investigation or regular control can lead to inefficient usage of the
> Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and other type of abuses.
> >
> > 2.0 Summary of How this Proposal Addresses the Problem
> >
> > In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC
> shall conduct regular reviews of resource utilization held by its members.
> This would allow recovery of any type of resource, where usage is not in
> compliance with the RSA. Those resources can be reallocated for better
> usage.
> >
> > 3.0 Proposal
> >
> > The policy proposal will modify the CPM as follows:
> >
> > Insert a section 13 to the CPM as follows:
> >
> > 13.0 Internet Number Resources Review
> >
> > Regular reviews of resource utilization are conducted by AFRINIC to
> ensure efficient and appropriate usage of resources. This allows for
> recovery of any type of resource where usage is not in compliance with the
> RSA; to allow such resources to be reallocated for better usage.
> >
> > 13.1 The reviews shall be based on compliance with the terms outlined in
> the RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
> >
> > 13.2 The reviews cover all allocated/Assigned resources, but priority
> goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
> >
> > 13.3 Classes of review: Members to be reviewed shall be selected
> according to the following classes:
> >
> > 13.3.1 Random
> >
> > The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random between the membership.
> >
> >
> > 13.3.2 Selected
> >
> >  Member is selected because of an internal report or due to a lack of
> contact between the AFRINIC and the member.
> >
> > 13.3.3 Reported: Here, members are reviewed either because:
> >
> > A) They have requested the review themselves or
> >
> > B) There has been a community complaint made against them that warrants
> investigation. Complaints shall be backed by evidence and AFRINIC staff
> shall evaluate the facts as appropriate to conduct the review. However this
> review is not applicable to a member  with the same resources portfolio on
> which a full review has been completed in the preceding 24 months.
> >
> >  AFRINIC staff may, at its sole discretion, after having assessed the
> nature of the evidence found in the community complaint, require that such
> evidence be (i) submitted in the form of a sworn affidavit or (ii) declared
> to be true before a Commissioner of Oath.
> >
> > 13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence has been established in
> accordance with:
> >
> > •    Breach of AFRINIC policies
> > •    Breach of the provisions of the registration service agreement or
> other legal agreements between the organization holding the resource and
> AFRINIC.
> >
> > AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery process.
> >
> > A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the organization and correct any
> discrepancy towards the RSA.
> >
> > B) If the situation cannot be rectified and the member did not transfer
> the ressources to meet other AFRINIC-approved needs as per adopted policies
> >
> >  AFRINIC shall publish the resources to be recovered for a period of
> three (3) months; during which the organization may at any time, seek
> compliance or transfer the ressources to other members
> >
> >  After this period, the resource shall be recovered and therefore the
> records of the previous holder of the recovered resource shall be updated
> in AFRINIC’s databases.
> >
> > C)  Any Internet Number Resources recovered under this policy may be
> assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and Assignment Policies.
> >
> > 13.5 Appeal procedure
> >
> > Reviewed members who are not satisfied have the right to appeal against
> the result within the four weeks. Appeals shall follow an arbitration
> process as provided for in the
> > Code de Procedure Civile (Code of Civil Procedure) of the Republic of
> Mauritius. AFRINIC may, on request from an aggrieved party, suggest a pool
> of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable volunteers from the community.
> >
> > 13.6 Compliance Report
> >
> > AFRINIC shall publish an annual meaningful report describing review
> activities, in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
> >
> > 13.7 Acknowledgements
> >
> > The authors thank Ms Wafa Dahmani Zaafouri (become Afrinic GC Chair), Mr
> Serge ILUNGA (become Afrinic Board member)  and Mr Alain P. Aina for their
> contributions  in the development of this Policy proposal.
> >
> > The authors also thank the community for the discussions and
> contributions.
> >
> > 4.0 Revision History
> > Date
> > Details
> > 18 May 2016
> >   Version 1.0
> > - First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
> > - Posted on RPD list
> > 05 Aug 2016
> >   Version 2.0
> > - Second Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT02
> > - Change on the policy’s name
> > - Addition of the Acknowledgement section
> > - Rephrasing of section 3.3.3
> > 18 Nov 2016
> > Version 3.0
> > - Third Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT03
> > - Update of section 3.3.3 from discussions on mailing list
> > - Update of section 3.7 (Acknowledgements) to thank the community for
> discussions and contributions
> > 11 Apr 2017
> > Version 4.0
> > - Fourth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT04
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.4
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.5
> > - Update and Rephrasing of section 3.6
> >
> > 21 Oct. 2107
> > Version 5.0
> > - Fiveth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT05
> > - Adding the paragraphe C to 13.3.3. according to the legal counsel
> proposition
> > - Rephrasing the paragraphe 13.5 to comply with staff and legal
> assessment
> > - Rephrasing the paragraphe 13.6 to comply with staff assessment and
> avoid any ambiguity
> > - Changing the co-authors list
> > - Updating the Acknowledgement session
> > - Amending 13.4 (B) to  reflect the Transfer policies
> >
> > 06 Apr. 2018
> >
> > Version 6.0
> > - Sixth Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT06
> > - Removing categorization between membership in random class section
> 13.3.1
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> End ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 2018-04-03 7:50 GMT+00:00 Ernest Byaruhanga <ernest at afrinic.net>:
> > Hi Arnaud,
> >
> >> On 31 Mar 2018, at 18:41, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear PDWG,
> >> As you can see through the Lagos PPM minutes [1],  all  pending legal
> concerns  have been addressed. Last suggestion  received abiut removing
> categories in section 13.3.1( make the random selection applies to all
> members)  was  accepted by working group and  will reflect  in the next
> version  to come.
> >>
> >> While awaiting the new version, please send any new comments,
> suggestions you may have on the proposal [2]
> >>
> >> [1] https://afrinic.net/fr/library/policies/archive/ppm-
> minutes/2261-afrinic-27-pdwg-meeting-minutes
> >> [2] https://afrinic.net/fr/community/policy-development/
> policy-proposals/2231-internet-number-resources-review-by-afrinic
> >
> > Please send the new version well ahead of the recommended CPM 3.4.2
> deadline to allow reasonable time for staff's assessment of the updated
> proposal.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ernest.
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180410/b0ebc1a0/attachment-0001.html>