[rpd] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07 policy appeal

[Boubakar Barry]

To be honest, I don’t understand why we keep wasting time in this.

As many have stated, the Appeal Committee has communicated a timeline.

Why can’t we just wait for the committee to come back to us with its
analysis and conclusion?

Too much time wasting here.

Boubakar

On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 at 18:38, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:

> The point is nobody was attacking the committee. We were raising an
> objection to something we perceived as an improper procedural intent
> expressed by said committee and requesting that intent be rectified.
>
> No malice, no ad hominem, no attack, no lack of faith, just a simple
> attempt to correct what we perceived as an error.
>
> Owen
>
>
> On Jan 25, 2018, at 06:17, Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> wrote:
>
> Saul
>
>
>
> You see we are now all speculating on a potential outcome of the work and
> then even anticipating consequences of a decision that might not be
> expected by parties by the “can of worms” statement.
>
>
>
> I think right now all that is not at all necessary.
>
>
>
> *From: *Saul Stein <saul at enetworks.co.za>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 3:26 PM
> *To: *Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>,
> Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> *Subject: *RE: [rpd] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07
> policy appeal
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> No-one is saying that the committee mustn’t get on with their work, the
> comments are based on the reference:
>
>
>
> >https://www.afrinic.net/images/timeline-2018-01-pdwg-appeal-committee.pdf
>
> >1. Appeal Committee 1st Meeting – 19/01/2018 – week 1
>
> >c. List and request documents from AFRINIC that the Committee deems
> needed for the Appeal including i. RPD discussion summary on the policy
>
>
>
> The points that have been made are that since this is an appeal, the
> appeal committee should be drawing their own conclusions from the source
> documents, not other subjective reports and summaries.
>
> We’d hate for the appeal committee to base their responses on summaries as
> that could lead to a rejection as vital pertinent information might be
> omitted in the summary. That would open a serious can of worms!
>
>
>
> That is the way I see this, if I am incorrect, please correct me (and
> please, only corrections from the appeal committee members, otherwise its
> hearsay and not fact.)
>
>
>
> My 2c
>
> Saul
>
>
>
> *From:* Badru Ntege [mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
> <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>]
> *Sent:* 25 January 2018 01:40 PM
> *To:* Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>; Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07
> policy appeal
>
>
>
> Members Members
>
>
>
> We are all acting like the end of the world is nigh !!!
>
>
>
> We have a committee that we have entrusted as the final Arbitrator.
>
>
>
> Lets await the outcome and also be ready to accept the outcome and move on
> with AfriNIC work.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>
> *Date: *Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 11:58 AM
> *To: *Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *rpd List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> *Subject: *Re: [rpd] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07
> policy appeal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 25 Jan 2018 11:49 a.m., "Kris Seeburn" <seeburn.k at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am not going going in circles i have faith that the independent appeals
> committee is gona do the job. But i’d prefer they do in in their own mind
> not to involve others such as staff to come to conclusion. But i’m saying i
> support them without them being influenced that’s my only issue. The people
> in the committee are laudable and respected by the community. I dont doubt
> that at all. But not to be influenced by emails, staff, or board. Thats
> what everyone wants.
>
>
>
> OK
>
>
>
> And am waiting to see something right.
>
>
>
> You are doubting still.
>
>
>
> Anyways, what is that something right?
>
>
>
>
>
> Which would raise afrinic’s place in the RIR space.
>
>
>
> Was AFRINIC place is the RIR space low which needs raising? [1]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Noah
>
>
>
> [1]IMHO, AFRINIC has done a great job since its inception unless if you
> think otherwise. We should all be proud.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180125/b5abb40b/attachment-0001.html>