Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07 policy appeal

ALI Hadji Mmadi alihadji90 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 25 04:54:38 UTC 2018


>I find this response extremely unacceptable coming from a member of the
appeals committee. Outsourcing its main task to a potentially biased third
party creates a conflict of >interest. An appeals committee has to be
independent and neutral to do its job. I don't care *how* the committee
does that, but that's the job it has to do.

In this case, we don't need pressures.
Sander, a little responsibility

2018-01-25 0:35 GMT+03:00 Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>:

> > Then please back off and stop telling the Appeals Committee how to do
> its job ... please
> > back off.
>
> I find this response extremely unacceptable coming from a member of the
> appeals committee. Outsourcing its main task to a potentially biased third
> party creates a conflict of interest. An appeals committee has to be
> independent and neutral to do its job. I don't care *how* the committee
> does that, but that's the job it has to do.
>
> Sincerely,
> Sander
>
>
> -- Ali
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180125/d47a3272/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list