[rpd] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07 policy appeal

[Andrew Alston]

I 100% agree with this - the appeal body is meant to be run autonomously and independently and needs to review the logs independently of influence by those that could be conflicted.

The emails are all available in the archives - the video footage is all online on youtube

Andrew


From: Sander Steffann [mailto:sander at steffann.nl]
Sent: 23 January 2018 15:29
To: wafa DAHMANI <wafa at ati.tn>
Cc: pdwg-appeal-committee at afrinic.net; rpd <rpd at afrinic.net>
Subject: Re: [rpd] [SUSPECTED SPAM] Timeline for handling AFPUB-2016-V4-001-DRAFT07 policy appeal

Hi,

It has been pointed out to me that I missed a word:

> I see a problem though. Point 1.c.i. asks AFRINIC for "RPD discussion summary on the policy". I think it is a good idea to let AFRINIC do this.

That last line should read "I think it is NOT a good idea to let AFRINIC do this. "

Sorry for the typo!
Sander



_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net<mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd<https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180123/945d90a4/attachment.html>