[rpd] Appeal against softlanding-bis declaration of consensus

[Daniel Yakmut]

My understanding of what the wordings of the policy as placed by Alain, is
that you cannot get more than a /18 in first phase of exhaustion, within
24months. But what is the period of phase One. So just why not your get /18
now and exhaust it.

If you can exhaust it on or before 24months then you wait for a next round
of allocation, if it is within the first phase you get another /18, else
you get /22if we in the second phase.

Wow! This is what I call fairness. So that "dog no go chop".

On Jan 10, 2018 9:09 PM, "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
wrote:

> Sorry – but – I’m kinda blown away here – so I need some clarification:
>
>
>
> Alain – Are you saying that you can go back for more space beyond the /18
> in a 24 month period – in contradiction of the clear wording of the policy
>
>
>
> If you are – are you claiming that this is what others who agreed with
> this policy believed? Or are you saying that is now your interpretation and
> that is NOT what got the support for the policy?
>
>
>
> Because this is pretty fundamental – either people believed the policy
> said something it certainly doesn’t – in which case the consensus argument
> is virtually null and void – because there is no consensus on what it
> actually says – or you are saying people knew the policy said you couldn’t
> go back – supported it on that basis – and you as the author are now
> misrepresenting what is already known.
>
>
>
> Which is it please? I’d like to understand?
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ALAIN AINA [mailto:aalain at trstech.net]
> *Sent:* 10 January 2018 22:38
> *To:* rpd at afrinic.net
> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Appeal against softlanding-bis declaration of
> consensus
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> > On 5 Jan 2018, at 10:05, Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 4 Jan 2018, at 15:56, Ornella GANKPA <honest1989 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyone can always get more allocation as long as they justify 90%
> >> utilization.
> >
> > That is accurate for the existing soft landing policy <
> https://afrinic.net/community/policy-development/2195-consolidated-policy-
> manual-v11#SoftLanding>, but it is not accurate for the soft landing bis
> proposal <https://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/
> policy-proposals/2197-ipv4-soft-landing-bis> (which recently ended last
> call and was sent to the Board for ratification, and which is the subject
> of an appeal).
> >
> > Under the soft landing bis proposal, no organisation will be able to
> receive more than a /18 of IPv4 space every 24 months during “Exhaustion
> Phase 1”, or a /22 every 24 months during “Exhaustion Phase 2”, even if
> they can demonstrate 90% utilisation.
> >
>
> Ornella presentation of the SL-BIS is accurate.
>
> SL-BIS set not limit on the number of requests a member can make until
> they reach the maximum allowable size during each exhaustion phase.
>
> Demonstrating efficient use of previous allocation of at least 90% is one
> of the allocation criteria for additional allocation.
>
> See below allowable limits and Allocation criteria.
>
> Allowable limits
>
> 5.4.6.1 Within any 24-month period during Exhaustion Phase 1, an
> organization may receive one or more allocations/assignments totalling the
> equivalent of a /18.
>
> 5.4.6.2 Within any 24-month period during Exhaustion Phase 2, an
> organization may receive one or more allocations/assignments totalling the
> equivalent of a /22.
>
> Allocations criteria
>
> 5.4.5.1 In order to receive IPv4 allocations or assignments during the
> Exhaustion Phase, the LIR or End User must meet IPv4 allocations or
> assignment policy requirements (by demonstrating and justifying the need
> for requested space) and must demonstrate to have efficiently used at least
> 90% of all previous allocations or assignments (including those made during
> both the Pre-Exhaustion and the Exhaustion Phase).
>
> 5.4.5.2 In the case of new LIRs or End Users (those that have no previous
> allocations or assignments prior to the Exhaustion phase), this requirement
> does not apply to their first allocation or assignment request.
>
>
> HTH
>
> —Alain
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180110/fc36b134/attachment.html>