[rpd] Softlanding-Bis decision appeal

[Frank Habicht]

Dear PDWG Chairs,

Please advise when and how my below concerns were addressed. I did not
see any communication doing that.

Thanks,
Frank


On 12/2/2017 8:45 AM, Frank Habicht wrote:
....
> Jackson,
> 
> Moving forward should NOT mean keeping useful numbering resources locked
> away (unnecessarily. and i don't see the necessity).
> 
> It should mean two things:
> 
> - making efficient use of all of the 32-bit integers that the majority
> of us use most of the time (still). Including those integers still with
> AfriNIC. They are meant to be used.
> 
> - more aggressive use of IPv6 as only this will be an alternative to the
> unusable internet that multi-layer IPv4 NAT is promising to cause, as
> more users are getting connected.
> 
> We can not afford to stash IPv4 addresses away for IPv15-transition.
> 
> Jackson, do you agree until here?