Search RPD Archives
[rpd] The need to review the existing soft landing policy (was Re: Two more petitioners)
jacksonmuthi at gmail.com
Sat Dec 30 16:54:11 UTC 2017
Come on now; Practice what you preach. You say we let the appeal committee
do it job.
Next you suggest the chairs made a mistake.
If you sheepishly ignore a blatant attempt by a community member to force
the government of mauritius to force the Board of AfriNIC to force policies
top down on its community then you are blind of what is going on here.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:55 PM, Kris Seeburn <seeburn.k at gmail.com> wrote:
> Let’s have a decorum on the list please. The old players know the ball
> game we do not need those new to the list to be spoiled. Shooting at each
> other here makes no sense. If there is grounds for Appeals, the board has
> setup up an Appeal committee already. So in the interest of not spamming
> the list with same opinions etc., let the process follow its path. I humbly
> implore to all that we respect and give respect to all on the list.
> We are mere human beings and we do not need to be firing all the time.
> Sometimes listening to others views can make sense sometimes not. This is
> why we have a wider community. *Petitions or not the board took its time
> but has an appeals committee set.* What will follow is in the hands of
> the instance we voted for the Board. *As far as PDP co-chairs they are in
> their learning curve everyone is bound to mistakes. *
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD