Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Report on the Policy Proposal "AFPUB-2017-DNS-001-DRAFT-02" (Lame Delegations in AFRINIC Reverse DNS).

Ish Sookun ish at
Thu Dec 28 10:16:35 UTC 2017

Hi Kris,

On 28/12/17 13:44, Kris Seeburn wrote:
> Once consensus is achieved the report that goes to Board is based on
> consensus and the process has been respected. The PDP then send a
> recommendation and based on the full process then only then will the
> Board resolves to pass the approval.

The PDP also mentions that the recommendation shall include "a report of
the discussions of the draft policy and feedback from the Last Call",
which in this case was not included.

> Since you were not there then i recommend you listen at the
> deliberations. Every meeting is recorded. It is not worth pestering the
> co-chair or board for a report which is merely recommendation to board
> for approval. It has always worked like that. So just look and listen at
> the recordings.

Well, I would not have used the word "pester" to describe anything here.
I merely suggested that IMHO the conclusion should reflect the
discussions & the Last Call, also as mentioned in the PDP. Lastly, I
would not call it "merely" recommendation if it influences the board
approval of a policy. I believe such matters require that process is
duly respected & recorded.


Ish Sookun

More information about the RPD mailing list