Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Two more petitioners

Owen DeLong owen at
Thu Dec 21 17:32:07 UTC 2017

> On Dec 21, 2017, at 02:33 , Noah <noah at> wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2017 10:37, "Mark Elkins" <mje at <mailto:mje at>> wrote:
> We really need to "eat" the existing IPv4 up quickly (in a responsible way, using the current policy) in order to leave no alternative except IPv6 deployment. Then, everybody wins.
> If we did what you have suggested above, we would end up starving so bad and while starving, the IPv$ brokers would swing in so fast and dictate the price of the readily available yet  much needed IPv4 space. 

Hmmm… Let’s see… Starve lots of people slowly (SL-BIS) vs. having a few people go hungry for a short period while alternate food supply chains are deployed (current policy).

Yeah… I’m with Mark on this one.

> Service delivery to the end user we love so much would become so expensive in order to recover the cost.

Or not.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list