Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Two more petitioners
owen at delong.com
Thu Dec 21 17:32:07 UTC 2017
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 02:33 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2017 10:37, "Mark Elkins" <mje at posix.co.za <mailto:mje at posix.co.za>> wrote:
> We really need to "eat" the existing IPv4 up quickly (in a responsible way, using the current policy) in order to leave no alternative except IPv6 deployment. Then, everybody wins.
> If we did what you have suggested above, we would end up starving so bad and while starving, the IPv$ brokers would swing in so fast and dictate the price of the readily available yet much needed IPv4 space.
Hmmm… Let’s see… Starve lots of people slowly (SL-BIS) vs. having a few people go hungry for a short period while alternate food supply chains are deployed (current policy).
Yeah… I’m with Mark on this one.
> Service delivery to the end user we love so much would become so expensive in order to recover the cost.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD