Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Two more petitioners
Andrew Alston
Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com
Tue Dec 19 09:02:46 UTC 2017
Ok So – Jackson – I went and did some research into actual penetration statistics and distribution of infrastructure.
So – Firstly – the ITU estimates the internet penetration in Africa as of 2016 to be 25% - not sub 1%
Secondly – In terms of Internet Penetration levels – South Africa is actually 5th on the list in Africa, being beaten out by Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, and the Seychelles.
Thirdly – Only 14 countries in Africa have penetration levels of less than 10% and only 4 have penetration levels of less than 5%
So sorry mate, your “facts” – aren’t born out by the numbers. Numbers don’t lie.
Andrew
For brevity – in the below tables – I have only taken the top 20 in each sorted table – if you want the full list let me know - I have also included a table on the lowest penetration percentages
Countries ranked by Internet Penetration in Africa:
Country
TLD
Allocated IP
Percent Of Total Allocation
Internet Users
Penetration
Kenya
KE
5548288
5.21%
43,329,434
89.40%
Mauritius
MU
2067456
1.94%
803,896
62.70%
Morocco
MA
10686720
10.03%
20,535,174
58.30%
Seychelles
SC
7969024
7.48%
55,119
56.50%
South Africa
ZA
28877824
27.11%
29,935,634
54.00%
Tunisia
TN
6013440
5.64%
5,848,534
50.90%
Cape Verde
CV
28672
0.03%
256,972
48.20%
Gabon
GA
356352
0.33%
865,492
48.10%
Nigeria
NG
2502656
2.35%
91,598,757
47.70%
Uganda
UG
888320
0.83%
19,000,000
45.60%
Algeria
DZ
4791040
4.50%
18,580,000
45.20%
Libya
LY
371712
0.35%
2,800,000
43.70%
Zimbabwe
ZW
100096
0.09%
6,722,677
41.10%
Botswana
BW
141568
0.13%
923,528
39.40%
Egypt
EG
22763008
21.37%
37,333,841
39.20%
Ghana
GH
2236416
2.10%
9,935,286
34.70%
Swaziland
SZ
47360
0.04%
436,051
33.00%
Namibia
NA
459008
0.43%
797,027
31.00%
Rwanda
RW
348672
0.33%
3,724,678
30.60%
Zambia
ZM
1096448
1.03%
5,192,284
30.10%
Countries ranked by percentage of IP allocation from AfriNIC:
Country
TLD
Allocated IP
Percent Of Total Allocation
Internet Users
Penetration
South Africa
ZA
28877824
27.11%
29,935,634
54.00%
Egypt
EG
22763008
21.37%
37,333,841
39.20%
Morocco
MA
10686720
10.03%
20,535,174
58.30%
Seychelles
SC
7969024
7.48%
55,119
56.50%
Tunisia
TN
6013440
5.64%
5,848,534
50.90%
Kenya
KE
5548288
5.21%
43,329,434
89.40%
Algeria
DZ
4791040
4.50%
18,580,000
45.20%
Nigeria
NG
2502656
2.35%
91,598,757
47.70%
Ghana
GH
2236416
2.10%
9,935,286
34.70%
Mauritius
MU
2067456
1.94%
803,896
62.70%
Sudan
SD
1328384
1.25%
11,806,570
28.00%
Angola
AO
1208576
1.13%
5,951,453
22.30%
Zambia
ZM
1096448
1.03%
5,192,284
30.10%
Tanzania
TZ
1046784
0.98%
7,394,079
13.00%
Cote De Voir
CI
903680
0.85%
6,318,355
26.50%
Uganda
UG
888320
0.83%
19,000,000
45.60%
Cameroon
CM
713984
0.67%
6,128,422
25.00%
Namibia
NA
459008
0.43%
797,027
31.00%
Mozambique
MZ
447744
0.42%
5,169,135
17.50%
Malawi
MW
418304
0.39%
1,758,503
9.60%
Lowest Penetration by Country:
Country
TLD
Allocated IP
Percent Of Total Allocation
Internet Users
Penetration
Eritria
ER
4096
0.00%
71,000
1.30%
Niger
NE
39936
0.04%
931,548
4.30%
Guinea-Bissau
GW
6144
0.01%
84,000
4.30%
Central African Republic
CF
7424
0.01%
246,432
4.80%
Chad
TD
20992
0.02%
748,274
5.00%
Madagascar
MG
167680
0.16%
1,300,000
5.10%
Burundi
BI
34816
0.03%
617,116
5.20%
DRC
CD
146944
0.14%
5,107,271
6.20%
Somalia
SO
37120
0.03%
900,000
7.90%
Comores
KM
5120
0.00%
65,578
7.90%
Republic of Congo
CG
119296
0.11%
400,000
8.20%
Liberia
LR
96768
0.09%
395,063
8.40%
Malawi
MW
418304
0.39%
1,758,503
9.60%
Guinea
GN
28416
0.03%
1,302,485
9.80%
Mali
ML
79872
0.07%
2,212,450
11.80%
Sierra Leone
SL
52224
0.05%
792,462
11.80%
Benin
BJ
165376
0.16%
1,375,033
12.00%
Tanzania
TZ
1046784
0.98%
7,394,079
13.00%
Togo
TG
312832
0.29%
869,956
13.00%
Burkina Faso
BF
293888
0.28%
2,684,265
14.00%
On 19/12/2017, 02:38, "Jackson Muthili" <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Andrew Alston
<Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
> While I am sorely tempted to respond point to point in your email and give
> you a lesson in facts - I will not dignify this nonesense with such.
You are the convener of opposers. I am open to read those facts.
> I will however say this - this is the second time you have introduced a
> racially biased context into the PDP - and discounted the will of a
> significant portion of the member base - based of blatant unsubstantiated
> and inaccurate prejudice
Thank you for the comment.
The operative words in your comments are :- THE WILL OF A SIGNIFICANT
PORTION OF THE MEMBER BASE
You see this is where the crux of your argument lies and where the problem is.
In your other email you state this same notion that those opposing
contribute 30% of AfriNIC revenue.
- AfriNIC is a non profit company managing a critical resource (IPs)
that is the engine of the internet which the UN already declared a
basic human right.
- Because of this very nature AfriNIC cant sell IPs to highest
bidders in an open market when those highest bidders pay the most
revenue. Otherwise yes I will state again that if this was the case
South Africa as the strongest economy (or one of the strongest) would
just buy off AfriNIC and its miniature IPs and game closed.
- You ostentatiously state that every country should be heard equally.
Thank you for ignoring the fact that the internet penetration rates
and state of the economy in South Africa (where you have convened the
largest opposition) - although it can be better - is light years ahead
of the other 53 African economies whose interests this policy proposal
is trying to protect. To burry your head in the sand and ignore these
realities does not take them away.
J
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20171219/1656ea74/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list