Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] [Community-Discuss] Removal of a director

Dewole Ajao dewole at forum.org.ng
Tue Dec 19 08:05:02 UTC 2017


Hi Badru Ntege, 

Your submission in the email below (regarded as disrespectful disagreement) are against the spirit of our discussions here and within the AFRINIC community as a whole. 
As a reminder, the code of conduct can be viewed at [ https://www.afrinic.net/community/code-of-conduct | https://www.afrinic.net/community/code-of-conduct ] 

Please withdraw that statement. In addition, your email account will be moderated on the rpd list for a period of two weeks. During the period for which your posts are moderated, someone will have to look at them to ensure they are acceptable before the posts are released to the mailing list. 

Regards, 
PDWG Co-Chairs. 


From: "Badru Ntege" <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com> 
To: "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl> 
Cc: "General Discussions of AFRINIC" <community-discuss at afrinic.net>, "rpd" <rpd at afrinic.net> 
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2017 5:54:43 AM 
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] [rpd] Removal of a director 

Boubaker 

I can surmise it in one word “hogwash” 

Regards. 

Sent from my iPhone 

On 18 Dec 2017, at 18:18, Sander Steffann < [ mailto:sander at steffann.nl | sander at steffann.nl ] > wrote: 




Hi Boubakar, 


BQ_BEGIN
Can someone summarize this for us? I anticipate that it will be very much appreciated. 



Sure! In fact, Andrew already anticipated most of that in his email: 


BQ_BEGIN
The summary though is as follows: 

BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN


BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN
– YES the members can remove a director – the process would be as follows: 

BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN


BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN
• Utilizing clause 7.6.viii of the bylaws invoke an SGMM – for the purposes of passing a special resolution to amend the bylaws to allow the community to remove a director – and please note – that special resolution could set the required voting percentage to remove said director at whatever they liked – there is now low watermark – it is subject to whatever is in the constitution (as per section 138.2 of the companies act) 

BQ_END

BQ_BEGIN
• Once (a) was completed – call a second SGMM – for the express purpose of the removal of one or more directors – send out the notice of said meeting with the required 14 day notice period - and then pass a resolution as permitted by the process performed in (a) 

BQ_END

Many of the details depend on whether legally Resource Members are seen as shareholders of Afrinic, or if only the 9 Registered Members (= the board) are considered as such. It is a question that I honestly have no answer to, and although Andrew expressed his opinion, he does note that he is not a lawyer and would like independent legal counsel on the matter. 

Cheers, 
Sander 


_______________________________________________ 
Community-Discuss mailing list 
[ mailto:Community-Discuss at afrinic.net | Community-Discuss at afrinic.net ] 
[ https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss | https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss ] 

BQ_END


_______________________________________________ 
Community-Discuss mailing list 
Community-Discuss at afrinic.net 
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20171219/5f803b05/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list