Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Version: 5.0 "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC"

Arnaud AMELINA amelnaud at
Thu Nov 23 18:17:21 UTC 2017

Hi Nishal,

We acknowledged that this has been raised and discussed. Main concerns
being addressed were issues of limited resources. The authors have no issue
with turning the  13.3.1 to the text below:

 13.3.1 Random
The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random between  the membership.

We trust Afrinic for making  the right choices with the available resources
for an efficient review of  usage of allocated  resources.

We have noted your support to a v6.0 with the new 13.3.1 . Same for the two
others who also opposed v5.0 for the same reason.

The new version under discussion is the outcome of our works with the legal
counsel and staff to address all the legal issues raised. We encourage the
community to read, digest the changes and comment.



2017-11-19 10:33 GMT+00:00 Nishal Goburdhan <nishal at>:

> On 15 Nov 2017, at 15:41, Sami Salih wrote:
>> A new updated version (Version: 5.0) of the policy proposal
>> "AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT-05" titled "Internet Number Resources review by
>> AFRINIC" has been received and published in the policy development portal
>> in the following link
>> proposals/2231-internet-number-resources-review-by-afrinic
>> We shall consider this version on our discussion in the next PDP session.
> sadly the part about treating all members equally seems to be ignored;
> 13.3.1 still doesn’t include all members, and as has been repeatedly
> explained, the smaller members are just as guilty of using resources
> unwisely.
> so, still oppose, until it’s made clear (in text) that the same rules
> apply to everyone.
> —n.
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list