[rpd] Appeal Committee Terms of Reference (Version 1)

[Hountomey Jean Robert]

Dear Chairman,


Thank you for your response.

I understand that the Board is free to implement what it deems appropriate
for the Appeal Committee and I thank the board for the exercise of
transparency.

However, I am grateful for your consideration of the observations below. My
proposal and recommendations are at goo.gl/2gSoKT

(I have sent a PDF version to the Board as well)


1. Suggestion for future “request for input from the community”

For future requests for input from the community,  please implement a web
form where  we can post comments.

It will avoid back and forth messages, and unnecessary spam including off
topics email threads.


2. The matter

As specified in Section 3.5 of the Consolidated Policy Manual, this is
related to a disagreement with the action taken by the PDWG Chair(s).

While following the RPD mailing list appears as an advantage, it is not be
a requirement.

Anyone with sound judgment and integrity can sit in the Appeal Committee.


3. AfriNIC Critical Success factors

I recall the AfriNIC’s critical success factors as you can read here
https://www.afrinic.net/en/about/origins


4. Responsibilities

The Internet Community has entrusted AfriNIC and its community to manage
block of number resources.

Let's not run away from responsibilities when things are difficult.

If we cannot trust the resilience of our community and our ability to raise
above personal agendas, I wonder who can trust us.


5.  AFRINIC Service Region

All reference to AfriNIC’s service region (or region) in the document is as
defined at https://afrinic.net/en/about/service-region


6. Community

Community refers to the definition of RIR Communities as defined by the NRO.

https://www.nro.net/about-the-nro/regional-internet-registries/


Thank You.


Regards.


Jean-Robert Hountomey.

Note: Opinions are my own.


2017-08-03 6:54 GMT-05:00 Sunday Folayan <sfolayan at gmail.com>:

> Dear JRH, PDWG,
>
> Thank you for the various comments and questions on the Board's reasoning
> RE: Appeal Committee's TOR.
>
> Recall my initial email that we will not be responding to every comments
> and conversation, but will put together and consider all comments at the
> end of the comments period.
>
> The Board continues to encourage an active discussion on the matter and we
> will compile all views at the end of the comments period.
>
> Kindly make alternative proposals to whatever arrangement you consider not
> appropriate in the current draft TOR as circulated.
>
> Best regards
>
> Sunday.
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Sunday Adekunle Folayan
> Managing Director
> General data Engineering Services (SKANNET)
> 16 Oshin Road, Kongi Bodija, Ibadan - Nigeria
> Phone: +234 802 291 2202 <+234%20802%20291%202202>, +234 816 866 7523 <+234%20816%20866%207523>
> Email: sfolayan at skannet.com.ng, sfolayan at gmail.com
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170818/f74f5190/attachment.html>