[rpd] Appeal Committee Terms of Reference (Version 1)

[Owen DeLong]

I understand why you think these are better, but I will agree to disagree.

I think any of those constructs would result in factional distrust of the outcome of the process.

Owen

> On Aug 10, 2017, at 00:40 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9 Aug 2017 23:05, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
>>  If you’ve got a better actual proposal, let’s hear it.
> 
> 
> 
> Option 1
> ######
> 
> Seat 1 and seat 2 to past cochairs 
> 
> Seat 3 and seat 4  for Afrinic community members with at least 2 years participation in policy discussions (rpd and ppm). Board appoint or nomcom process
> 
> Seat 5  board member
> 
> Option2 
> ######
> 
> Seat 1 and seat 2 to past cochairs 
> 
> Seat 3 and seat 4   board members
> 
> Seat 5  CoE
> 
> Option3  
> ######
> 
> Seat 1 and seat 2 to past cochairs 
> 
> Seat 3 for  afrinic community member with at least 2 years participation in policy discussions (rpd and ppm). Board appointee  or nomcom process
> 
> Seat 4 CoE
> 
> Seat 5  board member
> 
> 
>  Option 4 
> ########
> 
> Seat 1 and seat 2 to past cochairs 
> 
> Seat 3  region ASO/AC community elected representative 
> 
>  seat 4 CoE  
> 
> Seat 5  board member
> 
> In summary it would look like below.
> 
> 1: past(2), community(2), board(1) 
> 2: past(2), board(2), CoE(1) 
> 3: past(2), community (1), coe(1),board(1)
> 4: past (2),ASO/AC community  (1), coe (1),board (1
> 
> It can keep going and more folk can add their comments and suggest 
> 
> Cheers
> Noah
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170810/e8ddd3c9/attachment.html>