Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Appeal Committee Terms of Reference (Version 1)

Noah noah at
Thu Aug 3 11:18:22 UTC 2017

On 3 Aug 2017 2:00 p.m., "Nishal Goburdhan" <nishal at>

On 02 Aug 2017, at 20:59, Noah <noah at> wrote:


> Since this are your own opinions, I will tell you that there is nothing
reasonable or wise here.

that’s just *your* opinion;  and, in as much as you believe owen to be
incorrect, i believe the latter part of your statement above, to be false.

And it being false is your opininion too Nishal.

And yes its my opinion and am saying I dont see anything reasonable or wise
about it because the premise upon which owen argued doesnt hold any waters
in my opinion.

i don’t see a problem with independent (read: "outsider") committee
members.  i can’t see how that hinders a show of transparency.
i *would* have a problem with this, if the committee was made *solely* of

I see a problem and I am saying independent but from within our own
community and region and that is my opinion.

but it’s not.

its almost and that is enough for me to object to such suggestions
considering the enormous wealthy of vibrant folk in this continent who can
take uo seat 3, 5, and 5.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list