Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing BIS

Alan Barrett alan.barrett at
Sun Jul 30 06:57:05 UTC 2017

> On 29 Jul 2017, at 11:15, Ish Sookun <ish at> wrote:
> My point is rather that Section of the IPv4 Soft Landing
> policy proposal should be considered "current phase" and the mention of
> /10 in the proposal is incorrect.

In any revision to the soft landing policy, I would suggest that the authors use a term like “pre-exhaustion phase” instead of “current phase”, because the phase that was current at the time the policy was written, the phase that is current today, and the phase that will be current in 5 years from now, are not all the same.

Alan Barrett

More information about the RPD mailing list