[rpd] "No Reverse Unless Assigned" policy

[Arthur Carindal]

Dear Alain



Please find below some statistics 



> On 13 Jul 2017, at 18:31, ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 23 May 2017, at 04:10, Ernest <ernest at afrinic.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Alain,
>> 
>> ALAIN AINA wrote on 22/05/2017 20:39:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> It looks like the "No Reverse Unless Assigned” policy( 1) is not covered by the CPM. Is this an oversight ?
>> 
>> Yes. We are in the process of compiling inconsistencies in version
>> 1.0 of the CPM, towards producing version 2.0. Thank you for
>> pointing this out.
>> 
>>> I am interested in this policy implementation report:
>>> 
>>> Has AFRINIC managed to contact members with delegations and no assignments ? 
>> 
>> Yes.
>> 
>>> What percentage of members has fixed assignments for corresponding delegations ?

On 21 July 2016, we recorded 188 members not complying with the No Reverse Unless Assigned” policy.  Since that date we have been sending reminders to register PA assignments. As of 30 June 2017, only 88  (46% of these 188)  are still non compliant.



>>> Has AFRINIC deleted some delegations after the 12 months notice ?
>> 
>> We will provide this information shortly.


AFRINIC has not yet deleted any of these delegations however the non-compliant members can’t proceed with rDNS service until they registered all PA assignments. 


Regards

Arthur  Carindal
AFRINIC

> 
> 
> Did i miss this ?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> —Alain
> 
>> 
>> Ernest.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170719/4c01efec/attachment.html>