Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Thinking of soft landing... and IPv6 Deployment
nishal at controlfreak.co.za
Wed Jun 7 12:00:03 UTC 2017
> On 07 Jun 2017, at 10:51, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
> Thinking of soft landing, and having just completed Mukom's IPv6
> deployment challenge survey, my idle thought of the day;
> Firstly - no soft landing proposal should include promises of the member
> getting or deploying IPv6. What is should do though is:
> Unless you are a brand new members who has no resources of any kind, all
> requests for additional IPv4 space must be made from the members IPv6
> address space. i.e. - the e-mail request must come from one of the
> members e-mail servers to AFRINIC over IPv6 transport from an IPv6
> address belonging to that member. If the request is web based - then it
> must come from a device using that members IPv6 address space.
> (You have to have deployed IPv6 far enough in order to ask for
> additional IPv4 address space.)
> This should be technically very easy to check for.
why don’t you also incorporate a BCP-38 check in that too? caida’s even written the code for you  so there is little for staff to do.
and, how about making sure that they don’t have any listings in open-[dns|ntp|snmp|chargen]-project ?
after all, if they can’t look after the space they already have, why should they get more?
More information about the RPD