[rpd] AFRINIC Policy Development Process Bis Proposal

[Ismail Settenda]

I see reason as the current process seems encumbered with too many vague
areas that in turn either stall the process or consequently end up
discussing matters that aren’t core to the function of AfriNIC or waste
time.

Lets have more filtering of proposals, time bound stages and more clear
contingency measures in place.

That said I am firmly for consensus however lets NOT hold the process at
ransom and delay a working solution that needs to be applied to exigent
issues.

I am therefore for the proposal and please authors of the proposal do not
withdraw.

Best regards

--
Ismail

On 31 May 2017 at 09:16, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:

> I still see no reason for this Policy. It should be withdrawn. The
> current process is fine.
>
>
> On 29/05/2017 17:03, Dewole Ajao wrote:
> > Policy proposal and Staff analysis are at https://www.afrinic.net/en/
> community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2083-afrinic-
> policy-development-process-bis
> >
> > Please reply within this thread to submit your comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > PDWG Co-Chairs.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RPD mailing list
> > RPD at afrinic.net
> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> --
> Mark James ELKINS  -  Posix Systems - (South) Africa
> mje at posix.co.za       Tel: +27.128070590  Cell: +27.826010496
> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20170531/cba540b9/attachment.html>