Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Report of the Soft Landing isuue
noah at neo.co.tz
Tue Apr 4 21:03:08 UTC 2017
On 4 Apr 2017 11:59 p.m., "Jackson Muthili" <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> I must agree with Andrew in this. I think that when the gauging of
> is in the hands of just two people, having those people collaborate on the
> drafting of a policy for which they must then gauge consensus is an
> unacceptable conflict of interest.
You have touched a topic of interest: conflict.
We have a case of a policy proposed by a member of the AfriNIC Board.
The same board approves the policy for final use. You too have a case
of members of the AfriNIC board expressing strong opinions on a policy
when this same board sits at the top of the policy approval process.
As silly as it sounds when some of these guys say they are acting in
different capacities other than as Board members, there is a
compelling need to address these glaring loopholes in the process to
stop this absurd abuse of the process by the people supposed to
protect and shelter it.
They will invoke, any one has a right to propose... wait and see... signs
of a broken pdp...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD