[rpd] Summary of proposals: IPv4 Runout Management

[Noah]

On 8 Nov 2016 21:53, "Andrew Alston" <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com>
wrote:
>
> Noah,
>
>
> The AfriNIC policies at current are very clear – on application for space
you have to show that you can use 50% of it within 6 months and all of it
within 12 months.  Unless WACREN has a very strange use case for globally
unique space that is not announced that don’t know about – they are in
clear violation of the CURRENT policies, while trying to implement new ones
that will restrict others who are 100% in compliance who may need more
space.
>

What would have been the argument suppose the authors were not individuals
from Wacren but from some other member who has both v4 nd v6 announced?.

>
>  Of course as I have said, there are plenty of cases for globally unique
non announced space – and this MAY be the case in which case they have done
nothing wrong – but then I’m sure many of us would like to know what that
case is.
>

I will leave that to Wacren as its their network and am sure they have
there own reason. They could as well announce all their aggregates like
most folk out there are doing.

But i still dont see how relevant that is vs the policy the folk are
proposing.

>
> Andrew
>

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20161108/855b4eab/attachment-0001.html>