Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] New Proposal - "Internet Number Resources Audit by AFRINIC (AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01)"

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Sat May 21 07:53:53 UTC 2016


Dear Members,

We have received a new policy Proposal -  "Internet Number Resources Audit
by AFRINIC (AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01)"

Draft Policy name: Internet Number Resources Audit by AFRINIC
Unique identifier: AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01
Status: Under Discussion
Submission Date: 18 May 2016
Amends: None
Authors: Amelina Arnaud, Ilunga Kabwika Serge, Jean-Baptiste Millongo
Wafa Dahmani

Url:
http://afrinic.net/en/library/policies/1741-internet-number-resources-audit-by-afrinic

Text Below:

<http://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/1157-out-of-region-use-of-afrinic-internet-number-resources>*1)
Introduction*

As Internet Number resources are finite, their allocation is based on the
operational needs of end-users and Internet Services Providers while
avoiding stockpiling in accordance with RFC7020, IPv4 Allocation Policy
(AFPUB-2005-V4- 001), IPv6 Allocation and assignment policy
(AFPUB-2013-v6-001) and Policy for Autonomous System Numbers (ASN)
Management in the AFRINIC region (AFPUB-2004-ASN-001).

Section 4 of the Registration Service Agreement (RSA) provides the
framework for investigations of the usage of allocated Internet Number
resources, defines members’ obligation to cooperate and the measures to be
taken by AFRINIC in case of failure to comply.

The lack of such investigation or regular control can lead to inefficient
usage of the Internet Number resources, to stockpiling and other types of
abuse.


*2) Summary of How this Proposal Addresses the Problem*

In order to ensure efficient and appropriate use of resources, AFRINIC
shall conduct regular audits of resource utilisation held by its members.
This would allow recovery of any type of resource, where usage is not in
compliance with the RSA. Those resources can be reallocated for better
usage.


*3) Proposal*
3.1) The audits shall be based on compliance with the terms outlined in the
RSA and Allocation/Assignment Policies.
3.2) The audits cover all allocated or Assigned resources, but priority
goes to IPv4 and ASN mappable to two-octet ASN.
3.3) Classes of audit:

Members to be audited shall be selected according to the following classes:


a) Random:

The member is chosen by AFRINIC at random between members of the following
categories:

    Medium and above
    IPv6-only Large
    EU-AS


b) Selected:
A member is selected because of an internal report or due to a lack of
contact between the AFRINIC and the member.


c) Reported:
The members have requested the audit themselves or there has been a
community complaint made against them that requires investigation.


3.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence has been established in
accordance with the non-exhaustive list below:

a) Unjustified lack of visibility of the resource on the global routing
table.
b) Breach of AFRINIC policies.
c) Breach of the provisions of the registration service agreement or other
legal agreements between the organisation holding the resource and AFRINIC.
d) Evidence that an organisation is no more operating and its blocks have
not been transferred.
e) Unauthorised transfers under the provisions of the policies.


AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery process.

AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the organisation and correct any
discrepancy towards the RSA. If the situation cannot be rectified, AFRINIC
shall publish the resources to be recovered for a period of three (3)
months; during which the organisation may at any time, seek compliance.
After this period, the resource shall be recovered and therefore the
records of the previous holder of the recovered resource shall be removed
from AFRINIC databases.

 Any Internet Number Resources recovered under this policy may be
assigned/allocated under existing Allocation and Assignment Policies.


3.5 Appeal procedure
The audit shall be conducted in full transparency and neutrality. But if
the result of the audit does not appear to be fair, the audited members has
the right to appeal against the result. Appeals shall follow an arbitration
process as defined by AFRINIC, which shall publish the process and the pool
of arbitrators who shall be knowledgeable volunteers from the community.



Outcome of the arbitration process are unequivocal and without appeal.

3.6 Compliance Report
AFRNIC shall publish an annual report describing the members which have
been audited and their level of compliance.


*4.0 Revision History*
18 May 2016: First Draft AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT01 Posted on RPD list


*5.0 References*

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7020
http://afrinic.net/en/services/rs/rsa
http://www.afrinic.net/library/policies/126-policy-ipv4-address-allocation-policies
http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/policies/122-afpub-2013-v6-001
http://www.afrinic.net/en/library/policies/124-afpub-2004-asn-001

Best Regards
Relevant Url:
1. Policy Development process:
http://afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sami Salih & Seun Ojedeji
PDWG Co-Chairs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160521/4165f248/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list