[rpd] RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5

Tue Apr 5 10:22:31 UTC 2016

Bonjour,

Je supporte la proposition du /15.
Au vu des statistiques ci-dessous qui reflètent les *allocations *d'adresses
IPv4 faites par AfriNic ces trois (3) dernières années, la limitation a
probablement tout son sens.

2014           2015                       2016

"/11” (0.000%)        0 ( 50.064%) 4 (43.612%) 1
"/12" (61.692%) 7  (6.258%0 1 (43.612%) 2
“/13" ( 17.626%) 4 (12.516%) 4 (0.000%) 0
“/14" ( 8.813%) 4 (17.210%) 11 (0.000%) 0
“/15" (4.407%) 4 (3.129%) 4 (0.000%) 0
"/16" (1.652%) 3 (4.694%) 12 (6.814%) 5
“/17" (1.928%) 7 (2.151%) 11 (2.044%) 3
“/18" (0.964%) 7 (1.565%) 16 (1.704%) 5
“/19" (1.102%) 16 (1.027%) 21 (1.022%) 6
“/20" (0.792%) 23 (0.587%) 24 (0.426%) 5
“/21” (0.310%) 18 (0.220%) 18 (0.383%) 9
“/22" (0.714%) 83 (0.581%) 95 (0.383%) 18
“/23" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0
/“24" (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0 (0.000%) 0

Cdt,

2016-03-31 17:59 GMT+00:00 gregoire.ehoumi <gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr>:

> I'm ok with this resume, and support /15
>
> Best regards
>
> Gregoire EHOUMI
> -------- Original message --------
> From: rpd-request at afrinic.net
> Date: 2016-03-31 8:00 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: rpd at afrinic.net
> Subject: RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5
>
> Send RPD mailing list submissions to
> rpd at afrinic.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> rpd-request at afrinic.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> rpd-owner at afrinic.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. IPv4 Soft Landing-bis policy proposal discussions and
>       consensus (ALAIN AINA)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 22:07:40 +0400
> From: ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net>
> To: AfriNIC List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Subject: [rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing-bis policy proposal discussions and
> consensus
> Message-ID: <461D004D-2818-4E2C-93C3-ECADD715645E at trstech.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> Hello RPD,
>
> Once again, the authors would like to thank the RPD list and the community
> for the discussions and suggestions we had  so far about the soft
> landing-bis policy proposal.
>
> We discussed:
>
> - The Maximum of allocation/assignment  size in exhaustion phase 1
>
> - The IPv6 clause linked to allocation  during the exhaustion.
>    LIR and End users requesting IPv4 must have IPv6 resources from AFRINIC
> (or request concomitantly with the IPv4) or from their upstreams.
>
> - Reserves for new comers and Critical Internet Infrastructures during
> phase 2
>
> - Limitation on number of allocations/assignment during the exhaustion
>
>
> Most of the contributions showed support  to the IPv6 clause and to the
> reserves for "new comers" and  "Critical Internet Infrastructures". Authors
> consider that we have reached a fair consensus on these points.
>
> Many contributions on the list suggested  that the maximum of
> allocation/assignment size be set to lower than /15. Many others were
> however of the opinion of the authors. Therefore, we believe that /15 is a
> good compromise which serves  the best, the interest of the community at
> large.
>
> So  we call for consensus on the /15.
>
> We received many comments and queries on-list and off-list about limiting
> the number of additional requests from a member during phase 1. Phase 2
> having provisions for new comers and critical Internet Infrastructures.
>
> Concerns were that considering the current rate of allocation, Phase 1 may
> not last as expected.
>
> in 2014,AFRINIC issued  46,603 /24 IPv4 (11,930,368 IPs), 0.711105347 /8
> In 2015, AFRINIC issued 65,959 /24 IPv4 (16,885,504 IPs),1.006454468 /8
> in 2016 (30 March 2016), AFRINIC issued 18,820 /24 IPv4 (4,817,920 IPs),
> 0.28717041 /8
>
> As said before, this policy proposal tries to stay in the spirit of "IPv4
> Soft Landing Policy? which did not set limit of number of  additional
> allocations/assignments  to a member during the exhaustion as our region is
> emerging and AFRINIC is the RIR which distributed  the least  of IPV4. It
> just reduced the allocation/assignment period of 12 months to 8 months to
> only satisfy short and mid-term needs.
>
> To accommodate this request, we suggest the following change to the phase1
> allocation criteria:
>
> Phase 1
>
> - Maximum allocation/assignment size is /15
> - There is no explicit limit on the number of times an organisation may
> request additional IPv4 address space,
> "but the total of allocation/assignment to a member shall not exceed /15?
>
> Phase 2
>
> No change
>
> We would like to hear the community views on this.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> ?Alain(on behalf of the Authors)
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of RPD Digest, Vol 114, Issue 5
> ***********************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>

-- 
*Meilleures salutations / Best wishes,*

*Komi M. Woatéba ELITCHA*
BP/P.O. BOX: 8217 Lome -Togo
*Bureau/Office : 00228 98 58 89 02*
*Mobile : 00228 91 43 98 29*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20160405/142aa0e4/attachment-0001.html>