RE: [rpd] Afrinic policy proposal—Afrinic Service guild lines

[Kofi ANSA AKUFO]

Hi Keshwarsingh,

On Oct 27, 2014 2:22 PM, "Keshwarsingh Nadan" <
keshwarsingh.nadan at millenium.mu> wrote:
>
> Exhausting a /12 within a year is nothing.. In other words, Lu’s business
is flourishing.
>
>

In deed "its nothing" - the last time I checked not even a mobile telco had
achieved that in our region.

We must be tapping ourselves on the shoulder then if this translates to
content beneficial to our region.

>
> From: rpd-bounces at afrinic.net [mailto:rpd-bounces at afrinic.net] On Behalf
Of Kofi ANSA AKUFO
> Sent: 27 October 2014 13:25
> To: Lu
> Cc: rpd
> Subject: Re: [rpd] Afrinic policy proposal—Afrinic Service guild lines
>
>
>
> Hello Lu
>
>
>
> On 27 October 2014 08:51, Lu <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> W have been told our allocation is "under board review" for past 2 month,
I wonder how's that to be possible if board ha nothing to do with this?
>
>
>
> Amazing you have exhausted the /12 IPv4 (over a million IPv4 addresses)
Allocated to you within a year and requesting for more. What size are you
requesting now?
>
>
>>
>> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended
addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission
in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at
the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the
text of the transmission received.
>>
>> > On 2014年10月27日, at 上午4:13, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Oct 27, 2014, at 3:22 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>> >>> 5.Unless otherwise appealed, Afrinic board should not be directly
involved in IP allocation process.
>> >>
>> >> Agreed, although I do not think the board should be involved in
appeals.
>> >>
>> >> It used to be that in at least two other RIRs that I'm familiar with
(APNIC and ARIN), the board would _never_ be directly involved in the IP
allocation process.  The role of the boards of those two RIRs was to ensure
the policy development process was followed correctly and to be ultimately
responsible for the operation of the organization. I don't know if that's
still the case.
>> >
>> > That is the case.  In ARIN, there is an explicit wall between the
board and the resource allocation process, so that the board is never
involved in specific resource requests, reviews, or fulfillment.  I believe
that to be the case in other RIRs as well.
>> >
>> >                                -Bill
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rpd mailing list
>> > rpd at afrinic.net
>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>> _______________________________________________
>> rpd mailing list
>> rpd at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20141027/9a903750/attachment.html>