Search RPD Archives
[rpd] [afnog] A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!
Sunday Folayan
sfolayan at gmail.com
Sun Sep 21 23:33:55 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 21/09/2014 21:56, Kofi ANSA AKUFO wrote:
> On 21 September 2014 21:16, Andrew Alston
> <Andrew.Alston at liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
>
>> Kofi,
>>
>>
>>
>> Again speaking as myself and not representative of the board or
>> any other organisation to which I am affiliated.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you feel there should be policy updates, you as a member of
>> this community are as free as any other individual to draft and
>> propose policy amendments.
>>
>>
>>
>> Instead of everyone being upset by current policy and asking for
>> amendments and waiting for someone else to do it, how about
>> taking the lead and proposing some policy and if the community
>> agrees, we can implement?
>>
>>
>>
> Andrew I take that as as a challenge to propose an amendment to the
> current IPv4 allocation policies as well as promote building IPv6
> infrastructure in parallel to prevent our region from lagging
> behind in the current evolution to next generation infrastructure.
>
> As someone who has actively experience both sides of the process I
> believe I provided a fair platform in this discussion to the
> community of what is as stake.
>
> The community must realize they have the ultimate say in how our
> resources are exploited to promote regional development and hold
> accountable those entrusted to interpret policies.
>
> We could continue deceiving ourselves it is not the job of our
> internet registries (both RIR and LIRs) to "police" the allocation
> of our resources and proactive checks of right usage.
>
> The key phrase here is "promote regional development" BUT NOT
> necessarily "keep resources in the region". IMHO content and
> infrastructure in our region should be priority. Again we have the
> choice to be passive, turn blind eyes and entrust decision process
> to a few to make or proactively get involved to exploit our
> resources for the regions development.
>
> Cheers
>
> K.
So ... should the community expect a policy, taking advantage of your
"seen it all" position? If so, when? Time ticks ...
Sunday.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUH2BiAAoJEH6UvSz6fA25y98H/3szTTvKQXFqz2CRC0eoDktW
pt/q6ciTaUaIfGB17dIRgph5JM/MXFiPNKrvMrTZrItSVizuk98IF+8hcfAXsdNJ
Oqzc2BWnj86zB/kXqkBWqAf3pNTAxYVflkPlq8gEcnon52KrUomUDf7BuklcLQhj
gFMl1TraSHlx5aKwUogTMZr4tVpT9QAn/Qb7mpHVi6kWXkNw2jBUphKDALBVNp+z
lbBxXLU4yTYnTyxhTj/RH6fYpg9aDRYCKv2Op2nbDov+fFuU3dqnnavZCqC7p18V
+SDp3ZDj0SY/R0Frxsv+l+l98vzJQq5cY6E1TFuYD8rXLQNZODwNYkjPA2msHJo=
=/qzm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the RPD
mailing list