[rpd] [afnog] A typical case of abuse of our resources!!!

[Adiel Akplogan]

Hello Boubakar,

On Sep 20, 2014, at 23:28 PM, Boubakar Barry <boubakarbarry at gmail.com> wrote:
> The number of posts in this thread and the discussions held in Djibouti show that the community wants clarification on this allocation.
> 
> In the best interest of our organisation (i.e. AfriNIC) and in order to restore trust, Management and Board should take this seriously and provide adequate responses to the issues raised.

This allocation has followed the same process and procedure as any other requests sent to the IP analysts. In term of application and interpretation of the current policy nothing in this one was different. I think the RS team will be sending all the clarifications on the process shortly. Beyond that, I think there is a lot of emotional speculation that we need to avoid to be dragged into … as you said in the interest of the organisation. 

Thanks.

- a.

> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Noah Maina <mainanoa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20 September 2014 21:56, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On 20 September 2014 22:33, Noah Maina <mainanoa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20 September 2014 21:29, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20 September 2014 22:06, Noah Maina <mainanoa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20 September 2014 21:02, Kofi ANSA AKUFO <kofi.ansa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 20 September 2014 21:53, Noah Maina <mainanoa at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Otherwise my free googlemail space is almost full with endless troubleshooting.....
> 
> Hmm my brother
> 
> don't worry we will all tackle it the anytimeafrican way ...
> 
> 
> 
> I have never received SPAM from anytimeafrica.....
> 
> Seriously maybe the community will have to be the ultimate hostmasters to evaluate huge allocations ... 
> 
> -- > members are saying their request are forwarded to management and board for approval
> 
> -- > board members are giving personal opinion based on current policy they are not involved in evaluation and approval
> 
> Should we expect processes that output information into public whois db to be a blackbox?
> 
> 
> Well, I am not a believer of endless back and forth emails which do not yield no results ....
> 
> All am trying to point out to you is simple.... We as a community has solved so many issues through Policy and By-laws, So rather than waste loads of time going back and forth...How about you present a solution to his mailing list and the community through a Draft Policy and we move on from there.... 
> 
> And we as a community needs to come out with answers to questions asked Noah. We have existing policies in place and I believe some board members pointed out that. Hostmasters have also expressed their challenges in some of these evaluation at meetings.
> 
> IMHO Policies stand better chance to be effective when issues such as these are discussed openly even before they are drafted.
> 
> I am a firm advocate of Policy and By-Laws especially when we are using democratic mechanisms to enact them. 
> 
> Perhaps we should also turn to these same mechanisms to address some of the challenges of allocation of resources.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> #BoF
> #This discussion has been exhausted this far.....IMHO
> 
> If 
> 
> [ policy is drafted! ]
> 
> then
> 
> [ respond further ]
> 
> else,
> 
> [ black-list Kofi, Nadah ,Andrew, Badru, Sunday, et' al etc for no results is yet being yield ]
> 
> fi,
> 
> #EoF
>  
>  
> K.
> 
> 
> Noah 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20140921/81babdf0/attachment.sig>