Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Guessing is not the way to verify information
Alan Barrett
apb at cequrux.com
Fri Jun 6 17:43:08 UTC 2014
On Fri, 06 Jun 2014, Lu Heng wrote:
>End of the day, THE NOMINATION PROCESS NEED TO BE IMPROVED, and
>nomination committee should apologise to me for telling me who I am.
On the one hand, NomCom's job is to take in nominations and to
output a short list of candidates for the ballot, and they don't
need to give reasons for a decision to omit any candidate from the
ballot. On the other hand, if they do give reasons, then they
should expect the reasons to be scrutinised.
If a candidate fails to provide some required information, then I
think that the nomination committee should contact the candidate
at least once to request the information.
Also, if any of the information provided by a candidate appears
to contradict information known or believed by the nomination
committee via some other source, then I think that it would be
reasonable, though not necessary, for the nomination committee
to contact the candidate to give them a chance to explain. In
this case, it would have been reasonable for NomCom to send a
message saying something like "Your nomination said you lived in
Seychelles, but we have heard that you live in ${other_country},
please could you clarify?"
--apb (Alan Barrett)
More information about the RPD
mailing list