Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Fwd: Discussion about e-voting
Nii Narku Quaynor
quaynor at ghana.com
Mon May 12 19:28:43 UTC 2014
I wonder what one would say if one person was voting for all the 738 Afrinic members in good standing ?
Perhaps Afrinic needs to think through this some more
> On May 12, 2014, at 20:36, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 20:54 +0400, Kofi ansa akufo wrote:
>> Thanks for pointing out the voting procedure for individuals with
>> multiple votes.
> My pleasure. I hope I do not come over as being too heavy handed. I've
> been around a while.
>> What I am driving at is the integrity of the votes cast and how it
>> fairly represents the diverse community.
> I believe that the Elections and build-up processes that AFRINIC has are
> good. AFRINIC really does a pretty darn good job. I believe that as
> AFRINIC grows more towards a fully e-vote system, the integrity will
> improve though I should add I'm not aware of there ever having been a
> voting irregularity from the aspect of AFRINIC staff or systems. I would
> though personally miss the Paper Ballots and having the Staff from
> Visiting RAR's doing the counting...
>> Member entities should be encouraged as much as possible to
>> participate in the election process as well as being ptesent in
>> meetings instead of encouraging proxies be it they understand "AFRINIC
>> politics" or NOT to vote for multiple representatives.
> AFRINIC does stream most of the events - so its possible to be
> "included" without being physically there. A proxy (or preferably
> e-vote) is at least a sign of interest. I'd personally love to see all
> members vote.
>> I believe the community can do better by exploring how to map entities
>> eligible to vote to the electoral system to involve the diverse
> Go look at: http://afrinic.net/en/about-us/our-members
> At time of writing, we have 738 resource members who can vote (those in
> Good Standing).
> This e-mail written from my personal viewpoint.
>> On May 12, 2014 7:55 PM, "Mark Elkins" <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 18:42 +0400, Kofi ansa akufo wrote:
>>> Dear All
>>> 1. I am currently curious how individuals representing more
>> than one
>>> registered and / or resource member currently proceeds to
>>> votes online.
>> I have posted on this subject a few postings ago....
>> I am perhaps a perfect example of this scenario.
>>> Does the person login with the same nic-handle or different
>>> nic-handles to cast multiple votes respectively?
>> The same NIC handle and Password to the same account.
>> Once in, there is a drop-down box to allow the representative
>> (me, in
>> this case) to 'switch' to which ever entity I need to
>> represent or
>> This is a very convenient way of managing different entities.
>>> If by nic-handle wouldn't it be easy for voters to be
>> identified by
>>> the entities the represent (e.g. organisation ids) at least
>> as a
>>> secondary check prior to login to vote.
>> Generally, it is the entity that is the Member, not the person
>> with the
>> NIC-Handle.. more correctly, it is the entity's voting
>> who can vote. There may be more than one person per entity who
>> enabled to use that privilege, but there is only one vote per
>> for example "Resource Member".
>>> I ask this because this will facilitate implementation of
>>> machine for paper ballot sheets for those not able to
>>> e-voting based on logic and eliminate ending one voting
>> option before
>>> the other as well as human errors. Obviously NOT in the
>> coming 2014
>>> elections but later.
>>> 2. Going forward IMHO I think we should discouraged multiple
>> voting by
>>> an individual for different members since the probability of
>>> differently is low and this only goes to increase votes
>> across one
>>> side only. A "polished form" of election rigging. I know
>> some will
>>> argue one can still like gin with different credentials and
>> vote one
>>> sided but then :)
>>> Could someone from the community enlighten me on this
>> I'm a Director of multiple, independent companies each with
>> their own
>> resources and each members of AFRINIC in their own right. My
>> Directors may prefer me to do all the voting because I
>> understand a fair
>> amount of the 'Politics' of AFRINIC. Are you suggesting I
>> should not be
>> allowed? That will not make them happy.
>> Board Members have a Vote. If they also represent a resource
>> Member, are
>> you going to disenfranchise them that direct resource vote???
>> As you almost suggested, all I need to do then is sit down
>> with various
>> collogues and have them login to my-afrinic and cast their
>> according to my suggestions.
>> Your suggestion will achieve inconvenience.
>> Simply creating extra NIC-Handles should not work as AFRINIC
>> the official Identity of everyone who wishes to use the
>> Posted on my own behalf - representing multiple AFRINIC
> Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa
> mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496
> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
More information about the RPD