[AFRINIC-rpd] Renumbering statistics under AFPUB-2005-v4-001

[ARTHUR CARINDAL]

Dear SM

We are sorry for the delay in reverting to you with the answers to your  questions below.
After paying time to check our information, there  have not been any cases where AFRINIC (the company) has required a network to renumber, in compliance with this policy's stipulations.


Best Regards.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arthur Carindal N.                                           Tel:   +230 403 51 00
Head of Member Services, AFRINIC           Fax:  +230 466 67 58
arthur at afrinic.net - www.afrinic.net             Skype: arthur_carindal
                                                                            Sip: arthur at voip.afrinic.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please join us at the Africa Internet Summit, Lusaka, Zambia, 9 – 21 June 2013
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:34 AM, sm+afrinic at elandsys.com wrote:

> Hi PDWG Chairs,
> 
> I would like some information about the implementation aspects of the AFPUB-2005-v4-001 policy.
> 
> From Section 5.7 of AFPUB-2005-v4-001:
> 
>  "If the end-user / downstream network changes provider, the address space
>   assigned or sub-allocated by the previous service provider (LIR) should be
>   returned and the network renumbered."
> 
>  (i)   How many LIRs have pointed out that the above was a problem over the
>        last two years?
> 
>  (ii)  How many downstream networks have pointed out that the above was a
>        problem over the last two years?
> 
> Section 9.6 of AFPUB-2005-v4-001 is about renumbering.  I would be grateful if I could be provided with statistics about:
> 
> (a) The number of renumbering requests received over the last two years from LIRs.
> 
> (b) The number of renumbering requests from LIRs which have been accepted over the
>     last two years.
> 
> (c) A breakdown of the renumbering requests from LIRs which explains why renumbering
>     was requested.
> 
> Are there any cases where AfriNIC (the company) has required a network to renumber?  If so, which policy clause(s) was invoked for these cases?
> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd