[AfriNIC-rpd] Re: Draft Policy Proposal: No Reverse Unless Assigned ID: AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-01

[McTim]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:51 AM, SM <sm at resistor.net> wrote:

> Hi McTim,
>
> At 09:28 26-11-2012, McTim wrote:
>
>> I would very much like to see an estimate of the amount of work this
>> would put on the Registration Services Team, and note that the PDWG
>> co-chair has asked for such an impact assessment.
>>
>
> When did the PDWG co-chair ask for the assessment?
>
> The proposal mentions that:
>
>
>   "Assignments remain valid as long as the original criteria on which the
>    assignment was based are still in place and the assignment is registered
>    in the AfriNIC whois database.  An assignment is therefore invalid if it
>
>    is not registered in the database and if the purpose for which it was
>    registered has changed or no longer holds."
>
> Does that mean that:
>
>  (a) there are invalid assignments in the database
>


yes, I am sure there are many.


>
>  (b) there hasn't been any action to remove invalid assignments
>

except at additional allocation time perhaps, then action is taken.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20121129/f93f2923/attachment.html>