Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] Re: Draft Policy Proposal: No Reverse Unless Assigned ID: AFPUB-2012-DNS-001-DRAFT-01
dogwallah at gmail.com
Thu Nov 29 06:19:03 UTC 2012
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:51 AM, SM <sm at resistor.net> wrote:
> Hi McTim,
> At 09:28 26-11-2012, McTim wrote:
>> I would very much like to see an estimate of the amount of work this
>> would put on the Registration Services Team, and note that the PDWG
>> co-chair has asked for such an impact assessment.
> When did the PDWG co-chair ask for the assessment?
> The proposal mentions that:
> "Assignments remain valid as long as the original criteria on which the
> assignment was based are still in place and the assignment is registered
> in the AfriNIC whois database. An assignment is therefore invalid if it
> is not registered in the database and if the purpose for which it was
> registered has changed or no longer holds."
> Does that mean that:
> (a) there are invalid assignments in the database
yes, I am sure there are many.
> (b) there hasn't been any action to remove invalid assignments
except at additional allocation time perhaps, then action is taken.
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD