Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] Proposed text for AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-04

Owen DeLong owen at
Sun Jun 12 00:19:46 UTC 2011

It isn't intended as an RFc reference... It's just English language.

Is there anyone who does not feel that must better conveys the intent?

If not, I'd say that's a minor and useful change that can be made in last call without issue.


Sent from my iPad

On Jun 11, 2011, at 13:59, sm+afrinic at wrote:

> Hi Owen,
> At 01:43 PM 6/9/2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I would suggest must rather than should or shall.
> There isn't a reference to RFC 2119. :-)  Given the long discussions about that section in the proposal and the fact that the text has gained consensus from various sides, it may be easier not to attempt to optimize the text further.
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy 

More information about the RPD mailing list