[AfriNIC-rpd] Consensus call on Section 3.8 of AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-02 - IPv4 Soft Landing

[McTim]

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:48 PM, Trevor Mwangi <trevor.mwangi at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:
>
>  I'd personally be very dubious about anything bigger than a /14!!!
>>
>
> There have already been several 'large' allocations that should have caused
> you concern then (since 2010-->current)
>
>
> 197.224.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.224.0.0/14>
> /14ipv4allocated07-04-2010Mauritius 197.128.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.128.0.0/14>
> /14ipv4allocated11-11-2010Morocco 197.132.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.132.0.0/14>
> /14ipv4allocated15-12-2010Egypt 197.136.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.136.0.0/14>
> /14ipv4allocated22-12-2010Kenya 197.140.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.140.0.0/14>
> /14ipv4allocated29-12-2010Algeria 197.192.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.192.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated08-03-2010Egypt 197.200.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.200.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated28-05-2010Algeria 197.160.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.160.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated14-07-2010Egypt 197.168.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.168.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated22-09-2010South Africa 197.176.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.176.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated13-10-2010Kenya 197.96.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.96.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated30-11-2010South Africa 197.104.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.104.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated10-03-2011South Africa 197.120.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.120.0.0/13>
> /13ipv4allocated05-04-2011Egypt 197.64.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.64.0.0/12>
> /12ipv4allocated19-03-2011South Africa 197.0.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.0.0.0/11>
> /11ipv4allocated03-05-2010Tunisia 197.32.0.0<http://www.afrinic.net/cgi-bin/whois?recursive=ON&searchtext=197.32.0.0/11>
> /11ipv4allocated17-05-2011Egypt
>
> Anyway - I have full trust in the AfriNIC staff.
>>
>
> I expect the AfriNIC staff to adhere to the policies that are set.
>

As do I, that has never been in question.  It is entirely our (PDWGs)
responsibility to set a maximum allocation size.  Perhaps in hindsight, we
should have done that.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20110523/18c39462/attachment.html>