Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] Last Call procedure

Frank Habicht geier at
Wed Feb 16 04:35:40 UTC 2011


I support Owen's suggestion.

a) if future chairs are constrained, then this procedure can change.
b) it feels like making long-term regulations, but with short-term
naming. ie why not make it "right" [1] in the first place instead of
"planning" to have another change (and discussion) in the foreseeable

In addition I feel,
- the "at least two weeks" should be mentioned inside the procedure,
- there should be a time limit on start of last call
  suggesting something like:
  "within not more than 4 weeks after a face-to-face meeting"


[1] as good as we can at the moment

On 2/15/2011 10:09 PM, sm+afrinic at wrote:
> Hi Owen,
> At 09:36 AM 2/15/2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> May I respectfully suggest that you refer to the "co-chairs" rather
>> than the "interim
>> co-chairs" in this procedure.
> Thanks for the suggestion.
>> While the current co-chairs are interim in nature, I see no reason
>> this procedure
>> should expire when that changes.
> I try to document so that the community has an idea of what is being
> done and how it is being done.  I am reluctant to suggest any procedure
> that would constrain future Chairs as they may have different views
> about how things should be done.
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at

More information about the RPD mailing list