Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

Mark J Elkins mje at posix.co.za
Mon Mar 19 12:07:27 UTC 2007


Alain Patrick AINA wrote:
>> I think so. In principle our policies are not made for individuals
>> accessing those resources, unless clearly justified (and in this case I
>> think a good justification is to be an organization).
>>
>> Otherwise one of the missions of the RIRs, the adequate management of
>> address space (not a wasteful one), is not fulfilled.
>>     
>
>
>
>
> The question  is:  Do we think, the proposed criteria  are good for what we 
> intend to do with this policy ?
>
> If the answer is "no" and the solution is "be an organization", then let add
>
> * "Must be an organization"
>
> So, if a "individual" meet the initial  assignments criteria, he will need to  
> become an organization to qualify.
>
>   
>> Please, think in the implications in terms of routing table if just a 10%
>> of the individuals in the world are able to get this resource. Is not only
>> about the addressing space, which probably could perfectly cope with that
>> for 100% of the world population if using /48, but what about the routing
>> slots ? Are you willing to pay then for a 10 times more expensive router in
>> your network (you will not have other chance, you are being forced to that
>> if the routing table grows at that point).
>>
>> We need a balance here.
>>     
>
> I suspect that, we will need a definition of  "organization"  including size.
>   
Careful. My ISP currently has a payroll of 5 people. Thats a "small" 
organisation - but I'm very much an ISP... (I think so - anyway :)

If there is an individual that wants PI space - I think the vibe is the 
individual must become an organisation. I also think it would be 
exceedingly simple to have more than 5 members in that organisation if 
it were known that the criteria for getting PI space was set at "An 
Organisation with 5 or more members" - so setting definitions could be 
dangerous.

As you say - lets keep it simple....

I suspect that "Must be an organization" (without defining what an 
organisation is) along with the other criteria will present an 
appropriate prerequisite to applicants.
> And are we not meeting folks against this policy  here ?
>   
Sorry - can you re-explain the above point?
>
> --alain
>
> Let us  keep think simple  and move forward.
>
>
> --alain 
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>   


-- 
  .  .     ___. .__      Posix Systems - Sth Africa
 /| /|       / /__       mje at posix.co.za  -  Mark J Elkins, SCO ACE, Cisco CCIE
/ |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496




More information about the RPD mailing list