[AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

Hi Alain,

I'm not sure if you saw my previous comments on this.

If we use end-user/end-site, then we are allowing a residential customer (it
is an end-site/end-user) to get assigned a PI.

I don't think this is the intend of the policy proposal.

The wording end-user-organization, in my opinion, make sure that this is not
the case, and only organizations (not end-users as residential customers)
can opt for this.

The other point is also, of course if we want to have a debate among several
proposals or just one. I think it will be much easier to get a consensus if
we go for a single one, which unify the vision of more people, of course, if
we can agree on those nits.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Alain Patrick AINA <aalain at trstech.net>
> Organización: technologies réseaux et Solutions (www.trstech.net)
> Responder a: <aalain at trstech.net>, AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
> <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Fecha: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:10:16 +0000
> Para: <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Asunto: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal:
> IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites
> 
> On Friday 16 March 2007 10:05:40 Vincent Ngundi wrote:
>> Hi Colleagues,
>> 
>> I'm sending a copy of Jordi's amendments to the draft policy I
>> proposed for your consideration.
>> 
>> Kindly note that the points he intends to alter are as follows:
>> 
>> (a) changing the word "end-user(s)" to "end-user-organisation(s)"
>> 
>> (b) changing the assignment target from provides of "Public Internet
>> services" to providers of "services" thus;
>> 
>> "End-sites which provide Public Internet services for a single
>> administrative organisations' network, regardless of their size."
>> 
>> to
>> 
>> "End-sites which provide services for a single administrative
>> organisations' network, regardless of their size."
>> 
>> (c) There should be no need for assigning a prefix longer than /48;
>> thus a minimum assignment of a /48 or a shorter prefix if AfriNIC
>> deems there's justification.
> 
> 
> it is more than that.
> d)  changing "end-sites" to end-user-organizations
> 
> We could open  long discussions on these points, but i think they are not
> necessary.
> 
> The initial draft updated with the results on discussions on  "boundary"
> and "size" of  the specific block to be used for the assignments is ok for
> me.
> 
> --alain  
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.