Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[afrinic-resource-policy-discuss] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNICPolicy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment forEnd-Sites

Vincent Ngundi vincent at
Fri Feb 9 05:55:28 UTC 2007

> I guess I am not convinced that we need a PI policy for v6, except
> perhaps in the
> corner case of IXP's.
It would be nice if you could give reasons why you think the IPv6 PI  
policy (afpol-v6200701) is unnecessary, then the community would  
deduce whether there's a valid argument or not.

> For IXen I would give each one a /48 out of one reserved /32.
> If we need a special "IPv6 Address Space Policy for Internet  
> Exchange Points",
> I would be happy to write one up.  afpol-v6200606 is too extensive  
> I think it includes infra that is not "critical".
We have tried to incorporate the needs of IXP's in afpol-v6200701.


More information about the RPD mailing list