[Icann-aswg] Re: [governance] ICANN Africa Strategy

[Nii Quaynor]

Alice,

We will raise the issue of total inclusion of all constituencies/SO/ACs at next teleconference with ICANN to resolve; we did the same to add the current 5 regional/constituency reps

In the meantime Pierre has solicited assistance from Waudu to reach out to business and would recommend we do the same for Rafik for ncuc

Currently in a formal sense we don't have Alac nor ccnso either but we have afralo and aftld representation instead.  

When ICANN receives our report a new process starts and may be the appropriate time to solve these nuances

Regards
Nii

On Sep 14, 2012, at 16:32, Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org> wrote:

> Bill mentions Rafik, who is a current member of the gNSO. 
> 
> Perhaps the  idea is to ensure we have AC/SO's represented who can help ensure participation of ICANN constituencies. Representatives who can act as liaisons. 
> So far we have current members of GAC, ALAC, ccNSO, so perhaps we should ask gNSO to nominate? what do you think?
> 
> I also think we need to have ICANN hosting at least a forum/space on their site for this as well. 
> 
> Best regards
> Alice
> 
> 
>> Alice,
>> 
>> I don't know but will look
>> 
>> ....but a person perhaps needs not be on gNSO council but mere membership and African is enough ie from business, registrar, registry, ncuc or other constituencies is fine.
>> 
>> If so, both Mouhamet and I are registrars
>> 
>> Perhaps a recommendation we might make to ICANN is to ask all constituencies/SOs/ACs to respond to this draft strategy?
>> 
>> It's not clear how to formally include all 
>> 
>> Best
>> Nii
>> 
>> On Sep 14, 2012, at 16:07, Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> Thank you Nii. 
>>> Do we have a current member who is still serving on the gNSO?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>  Quaynor wrote:
>>>> Alice,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks. Rafik is fine. GNSO includes registrars....
>>>> 
>>>> Bill Drakes asks for the world and uses bad language 'exclusive' to get people against rather than noting that NCUC members can contribute by participation in the process
>>>> 
>>>> If we wanted every constituency represented it will be larger than current group of 9?
>>>> 
>>>> Any ideas how to proceed?
>>>> Best
>>>> Nii
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 14, 2012, at 15:13, Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Nii and all
>>>>> See below comment about gNSO representation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> best regards
>>>>> Alice
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject:	Re: [governance] ICANN Africa Strategy
>>>>> Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:07:49 +0200
>>>>> From:	William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
>>>>> To:	Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org>
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>  
>>>>> Core community nominated in Prague
>>>>> 
>>>>> Maimouna Diop Diagne - (GAC, West Africa)
>>>>> Palesa Legoze - (GAC, Southern AFrica)
>>>>> Pierre Dandjinou - (atLarge/ASO, West Africa)
>>>>> Nii Quaynor - (ICANN Board Alumni/atLarge/ccNSO/ASO, West Africa)
>>>>> Regional/Constituency nomination
>>>>> 
>>>>> Alice Munyua - (GAC, East Africa)
>>>>> Barrack Ong'ondo Otieno (ccNSO, East Africa)
>>>>> Mouhamet Diop - (ICANN Board Alumni/ASO/gNSO, West Africa) 
>>>>> Tijani Ben Jemaa - (atLarge, North Africa)
>>>>> Michel CAPDA - (atLarge, Central Africa) 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Why so exclusive?  No GNSO/NCUC representation?  Rafik would be good for this, some of our other members as well…
>>>>> 
>>>>> BD
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/icann-aswg/attachments/20120914/451d38f6/attachment.htm